In the cramped living spaces of Japan, when a dog barks too much and annoys the neighbors, they can get a court order to force the animal's owner to have its vocal cords removed, thus silencing it.
If only such a remedy were at hand for Vice President Annette Lu (
There was a time when we used to look forward to news from the vice president, if only because it would give us a good laugh. The highlight from the first Chen Shui-bian (
But in the wake of the devastation caused by Tropical Storm Mindulle, things have gone beyond a joke. Lu has outdone herself in the wacky ideas department with her suggestion that the people of storm-devastated central Taiwan pick up sticks and move to Central America to farm for a few years to give the central region a chance to rest. At the same time she has managed to be deeply insulting and offensive to the inhabitants of the central area, in particular to the Aborigines.
This time last year, this newspaper made it quite clear that we thought that Chen would have been wise not to select Lu as a running mate for his second term. We preferred either Yeh Chu-lan (
Nevertheless the president chose Lu a second time -- largely, we are led to believe, because he was reluctant to interfere with what had proved to be a winning combination.
In the end, Lu's presence on the ticket was not the drag it might have been, largely because she was kept quiet -- for which, much thanks. Since the election it has been a different story. Some of it was the kind of loopy nonsense we have become tired of even sneering at -- such as Lu's remarks that she was the primary target of the March 19 assassination attempt.
But Lu's post-storm remarks have shown someone with a seriously deficient grasp of reality, as well as a person chronically insensitive to the sensibilities of others -- the best example of this being her remarks, when faced with Aborigines demonstrating over her calling them the authors of their own misfortunes, that they should go back to singing and dancing (what they do best, in Lu's view) instead of protesting.
That this woman is the convener of the presidential offices' advisory group on human rights can hardly be appropriate, given that she displays both racial insensitivity and an attitude to solving problems beloved of the most disgusting tyrannies: shipping errant populations somewhere they won't do any more "harm."
But we might more usefully ask whether she ought to be vice president. The idea that she might succeed Chen is laughable. So it is something of a shame that this deadwood is occupying a position where another, younger talent might be groomed for succession.
It would be perhaps possible for Lu to "retire" for "health reasons." The problem is that her successor has to be nominated by the president and approved by the Legislative Yuan. Until the pan-greens control the legislature -- hopefully from next February, when the legislature elected in December actually takes office -- this will be an all but impossible task. Once the DPP and its allies control that body, however, pressure must be put on Lu to go.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not