Taiwan does not have the kind of unmanageable racial or religious conflicts that are a feature of flashpoints around the world. The great majority of people living here are Han Chinese, differentiated only by language and life experience. Sharing the island with them is an Aboriginal population that poses no threat to Han people in terms of number or economic strength. So all of the so-called ethnic conflicts and accusations of "Greater China consciousness," "Hoklo chauvinism" and other products of electioneering are merely forms of self-hypnosis to encourage a state of mutual enmity. Viewed from the outside, or even from any real understanding of China, these "conflicts" are simply absurd.
This is not to say that ethnic conflict does not exist. The harsh repression the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) employed against the people -- including Mainlanders who were "their own" people -- will not be easily forgotten. Besides, political parties, individual politicians and the media all benefit from controversy, which pours salt on old wounds rather than healing them.
But I believe there is a deeper cause that serves to consolidate ethnic divisions: feelings of superiority (and inferiority) and cultural discrimination (including self-denigration).
Generally speaking, many Mainlanders over a certain age -- many of whom live in Taipei -- feel superior to people from the center and the south of the country and look at the Mandarin spoken by them in the way that an old New Englander might regard the speech of anyone from west of the Appalachians. They feel they have seen the world; they are not "common."
In addition, under 50 years of KMT rule, a policy of ethnic discrimination was maintained, including within the household registration system, to ensure that preference for certain jobs was given to specific groups. Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), Hakka and Aboriginal languages were also suppressed in schools and the media. Through language and "place of birth" data, systemic indoctrination internalized distinctions of superiority and inferiority, sophistication and vulgarity, thus creating a benchmark for discrimination.
Hoklo people are now making a great fuss over re-establishing their own identity and building up their confidence as a polity. After the long years of colonial repression that they endured, this is not difficult to understand. But having freed themselves from being the victims of discrimination, Hoklo are now proceeding to despise the Hakka and the Aborigines.
Through a twisted psychology, the victim is now turning oppressor, and Hoklo are proceeding to reject Mainlander culture wholesale for the sake of self-aggrandizement. But it goes further. All groups of Han people are joining together to despise the Aborigines and develop a system of discrimination against foreign laborers or anyone from a Third World country.
As for Aborigines, they have long been pawns in political battles between various Han groups. Some Aboriginal political leaders have become familiar with the logic of these conflicts such that now, faced with Han political pressure, they launch counter-offensives using the same weapons of empty ideology. In the government agencies dealing with Aboriginal affairs, infighting over resources and the use of discrimination is unrivaled.
We should look at these ethnic divisions from the perspective of history, legislation and the deep-seated propensity for racial discrimination and feelings of superiority in Chinese culture. If ethnic groups do not reflect on their behavior before judging others, terms such as "ethnic equality" will become nothing more than empty political rhetoric.
Kuo Li-hsin is an executive member of the Campaign for Media Reform.
TRANSLATED BY Ian Bartholomew
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS