Alain Madelin, chairman of the French Liberal Democratic Party, has been openly critical of how cozy French President Jacques Chirac has been with the Chinese dictatorship, particularly his recent rolling out the red carpet for Chinese President Hu Jintao (
When Madelin came to Taiwan to meet President Chen Shui-bian (
Although wanting to laud such aspirations, offer support and encouragement and embrace the possibility that cross-strait conflict could be resolved through cooperation, Madelin lamented that such a scenario was impossible. He suggested Taiwan cannot possibly emulate the EU as long as China is determined to attack Taiwan, because the EU is based on "peaceful relations among all members."
How true. The former Soviet Union's satellites could not join NATO as long as the USSR was determined to attack it. Germany could not join the world as a respected democratic nation as long as it was determined to rule the world. Neither could Japan. But things change.
In the case of Germany and Japan, defeat in war, rehabilitation and democratic reform changed their situation. In the case of the Soviet Union, overwhelming US military might, free-market economics, democracy, and glasnost brought about the demise of communism and totalitarianism. What followed was unthinkable a decade earlier.
Madelin's comments highlight how arrogant the French government is to denigrate Taiwan's yearning for a change from China's bellicose ramblings. Instead of lauding Taiwan's yearning for freedom, the French have instead paid lip service to Chinese imperialism.
France talks up its purported democratic ideals and principles, but at the same time it rushes to Beijing to find out how many bombs, jet fighters, submarines and missiles it can sell to the world's most dangerous totalitarian dictatorship. While Madelin was visiting Chen, discussing constitutional and parliamentarian niceties, the French government was in Beijing hatching plans to sell bombs that could be used to destroy Taiwan.
Should we trust France under Chirac? Absolutely not.
Lee Long-hwa
United States
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS