Alain Madelin, chairman of the French Liberal Democratic Party, has been openly critical of how cozy French President Jacques Chirac has been with the Chinese dictatorship, particularly his recent rolling out the red carpet for Chinese President Hu Jintao (
When Madelin came to Taiwan to meet President Chen Shui-bian (
Although wanting to laud such aspirations, offer support and encouragement and embrace the possibility that cross-strait conflict could be resolved through cooperation, Madelin lamented that such a scenario was impossible. He suggested Taiwan cannot possibly emulate the EU as long as China is determined to attack Taiwan, because the EU is based on "peaceful relations among all members."
How true. The former Soviet Union's satellites could not join NATO as long as the USSR was determined to attack it. Germany could not join the world as a respected democratic nation as long as it was determined to rule the world. Neither could Japan. But things change.
In the case of Germany and Japan, defeat in war, rehabilitation and democratic reform changed their situation. In the case of the Soviet Union, overwhelming US military might, free-market economics, democracy, and glasnost brought about the demise of communism and totalitarianism. What followed was unthinkable a decade earlier.
Madelin's comments highlight how arrogant the French government is to denigrate Taiwan's yearning for a change from China's bellicose ramblings. Instead of lauding Taiwan's yearning for freedom, the French have instead paid lip service to Chinese imperialism.
France talks up its purported democratic ideals and principles, but at the same time it rushes to Beijing to find out how many bombs, jet fighters, submarines and missiles it can sell to the world's most dangerous totalitarian dictatorship. While Madelin was visiting Chen, discussing constitutional and parliamentarian niceties, the French government was in Beijing hatching plans to sell bombs that could be used to destroy Taiwan.
Should we trust France under Chirac? Absolutely not.
Lee Long-hwa
United States
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.