As the result of a resolution by the Government Information Office's (GIO) broadcasting license review committee, the operations of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-run China Television Company (CTV) and Broadcasting Corporation of China (BCC) have been thrown into a crisis. CTV has obtained a temporary license, and BCC is still awaiting a second assessment [of its license extension application]. The difficult question of how to resolve this situation has become the main concern of both these party-run enterprises.
Finding itself in this difficult situation, I imagine that the KMT is feeling wronged, thinking that the regulations stipulating the withdrawal of party, government and military from the television and broadcast media offers a two-year grace period, and that there really is no reason for the GIO to apply too much pressure before these two years are up. In addition, the GIO has not been very aggressive in dealing with the abuses of underground radio stations, and the DPP government has rewarded Chiang Hsia (
If the KMT really is holding these grudges and is angry over the unfairness of its treatment by the DPP government, and now wants to try to play on these feelings to win public support by blaming the GIO and the government, I can but sigh and wonder why these two parties always are using the media issue to show how much worse the other party is, instead of trying to show how good they themselves are. In a situation where the GIO has the law on its side, the KMT really should give some deep thought to how it should go about winning public support, instead of criticizing the DPP government in an endless war of words.
Prior to the presidential election, I offered a public suggestion to the KMT that its candidate Lien Chan (
If Chen had disagreed, the two parties would keep their media outlets, but the KMT would also gain the initiative in the media debate. No matter how you look at it, the KMT would only stand to gain.
Maybe the KMT at the time thought these simply were the narrow views of some egghead scholar, and so the party took no action. With the election over, however, the KMT seems to be losing in every aspect of the media debate, and so I wonder what the enlightened people in the KMT think about my suggestion now.
Although the KMT-run CTV and BCC are now on the chopping block, they still have a chance to expand their attack by taking this opportunity to make concessions to gain further advantages. My suggestion is that the KMT immediately reorganize the CTV and BCC boards of directors, or set up independent management committees, from which they withdraw all KMT members.
And not only that: they should also invite just and neutral experts acceptable to all circles of society to serve as directors and supervisors, and maybe even to take up top-level management positions. This would show the people of Taiwan the KMT's determination to immediately pull out of the television and broadcast media, and would win public support for the KMT. It would also give them ammunition to attack the DPP government by highlighting the government's mistake in rewarding people who helped in the presidential election campaign by appointing them to positions with control over media outlets.
Given the fact that the GIO currently is holding the upper hand, I believe this is the only strategy that would offer the KMT the opportunity to move from defense to attack. However, if the KMT fails to take advantage of this opportunity and instead continues its war of words, I can think of no further line of action and would have no choice but to continue to support the GIO's immediate cancelation of all CTV's and part of BCC's frequency licenses. After all, it would mean that the KMT itself is giving up any and all opportunities to legitimately hold on to CTV and BCC.
Chen Ping-hung is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Mass Communication at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS