Scandals are always worth delving into. But clearly, not every incident that occurs becomes a scandal. So what makes for a real scandal?
What factors are involved? How does it develop?
With a methodological approach, all these questions can be answered to reveal the logic and effects of a scandal.
Regardless of one's approach, the latest incident, which has been dubbed the "Lo Shih Scandal" and involves the first family's housekeeper, Lo Shih Li-yun (
The people involved are Lo and a man surnamed Chen. They do not hold high positions. They were hired by the National Security Bureau, one as a servant, the other as a security guard.
The money: Lo's compensation over the past three years has been less than NT$1 million, not even NT$300,000 per year.
Neither of these two points merit any further comment. This is nothing like the Chung Hsing Bills scandal, when the main character, People First Party Chairman James Soong (
The money involved reached into the hundreds of millions of NT dollars. Nor is it anything like the question of how KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The Chung Hsing Bills Finance affair merits the epithet "scandal," and so does the affair surrounding the Lien family fortune.
So why are we even talking about a "Lo Shih Scandal?"
What's more, Chen Ping-lin (陳炳林), a section chief in the National Security Bureau's Rules and Regulations Commission, has said that according to both an interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices and the trust and protection principle, Lo cannot be forced to return the compensation she received, which was less than NT$1 million.
Chen said, "Even if we wanted to, we might not be able to retrieve the money," because there has been no violation of administrative procedure.
In the Chung Hsing Bills scandal, on the other hand, Soong embezzled KMT party funds, and left the party without returning them. Only after being exposed was he forced to return the money.
There are no two ways about it: he took illegal possession of the money.
As for Lien, he has been a public servant all his life.
How could he have amassed such a substantial fortune? To this day, he is unable to give a clear account of the NT$36,280,000 he transferred to Wu Tse-yuan's (
So why has the Lo incident turned into a "scandal?"
The only reason is that it occurred in the home of the first family.
Any mistake committed by the first family, regardless of how insignificant, is played out before the whole nation.
But the attempt by the pan-blue camp and its supporting media to push the minor incident to its limit only shows that they have no substantive issues to work with. Instead, they used this trivial incident to launch a fierce attack. But instead of hurting their intended target, they may well have shot themselves in the foot.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS