Leaders and representatives of social groups met with Presidential Office Secretary-General Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) recently to lobby for social rights in the Constitution. These people hope the new Constitution will guarantee rights such as the right to shelter, health care, education, employment and pensions.
These groups are lobbying for a socialist government. They want to model Taiwan after some western European nations. But that would be a step back for Taiwan's hard-earned and maturing democracy.
The historic US Declaration of Independence contains text which resonates with freedom-loving people everywhere: we are all "endowed ... with certain unalienable rights" and "among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Those three things are the essence of a free society. We have the right to live. The government should not dictate where or when I die. (I don't have to worry every morning I wake up about being shot by police.) We have the right to be free. The government should not prohibit freedom of speech, the press and assembly. (I don't have to be afraid if I criticize the president in front of the presidential office.) And we have the right to pursue happiness. The government should not define happiness for me within the limits of law. (If spending money to buy a half-million-dollar TV makes me happy, the government cannot tell me to spend the money elsewhere.)
If we depend on the government for such things as shelter, health care, employment and education, then it is the government who can take all that away. A truly democratic and capitalist society, as Taiwan is quickly becoming, will have the means to sustain itself and its people, providing opportunities to those who desire them and are willing to work for them.
Just compare the Taiwan of 1960 to the Taiwan of 2004. Do you see how far we've come? Shelter, health care, employment, and education are really not "rights." They are privileges earned by participating in democracy and capitalism.
Think about what these social groups are advocating: the government will tell you where to live, when to see a doctor, how to work and what to learn.
Do you see the dire consequences now?
Social groups are founded with great purposes, such as helping the less fortunate and needy. It's a wonderful thing that Taiwan has so many groups formed with the agenda to shape a better, more tolerant society.
However, the Constitution need not include their agendas as "rights." Their efforts should remain in the private sector with assistance from the government if required -- but not to convert Taiwan into a socialist society.
Eugene Liu
Atlanta, Georgia
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS