Clarification requested
Your article ("Many entertain doubts about Paal," June 13, page 3) gravely misrepresented my stance on the special defense budget. You wrote: "The budget serves the US' interest but not necessarily Taiwan's, Hsiao said, and for Lin [Chung-mo], that is difficult to accept."
I was discussing with your reporter Melody Chen my understanding of Legislator Lin's view on the budget, but your choice of words misleads readers into thinking that I hold the same views.
In fact, I believe that weapons procurement is a necessary expenditure for the sake of national security. We in Taiwan must demonstrate a strong commitment to our self-defense and I urge the public and my colleagues in the Legislative Yuan to support the special budget.
Hsiao Bi-khim
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator
Editor's note:
The transcription of the discussion that led our reporter to write the paragraph went like this:
Hsiao: "In Taiwan-US relations, things that serve the US' interest do not necessarily serve Taiwan's. It is difficult for Lin to accept the US' position. I understand Lin's feelings."
The conversation was set in the context of Lin's spat with American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal that stemmed from the defense budget. It would be difficult for the reporter to imagine Hsiao was referring to anything besides the defense budget.
Legal process unfair
On June 3, my employer, Taiwan Colors Music, received notification from the Labor Bureau that my work permit had been cancelled and that I had to leave Taiwan within 14 days. This was unanticipated and shocking. But it was also the culmination of a program of systematic harassment carried out against me by the Taitung police, despite the facts that I have been a legal working resident since 1999 and that I have not been charged with any crime.
The trouble began on April 8 when the Taitung County Culture Bureau sponsored a press conference to publicize a performance series I've been part of (I've both performed in and helped book other artists for the Dulan Organic Music Series, held in a cafe 20km north of Taitung City). The following week, after the event was reported in local media, Taitung Foreign Affairs Police officer Peter Chen (陳允萍) called the cafe manager and threatened that, due to my participation, she was subject to an NT$150,000 fine and I was liable to deportation. Chen claimed that undercover officers had documented my involvement with video footage and photos.
County Culture Bureau Director Lin Yong-fa and the Taitung City mayor intervened on my behalf -- after all, I was unpaid, and the event benefited not only the cafe and the local community but also the bureau and the performers, for whom there is no other original music venue in Taitung.
Chen promised the officials that if I made a formal statement the case would be shelved. At the precinct office I was asked a number of questions relating to my performances without any mention of my right to remain silent or to consult a lawyer. Only when my answers were printed and handed to me did I see from the statement that I was under criminal investiga-tion, and the statement of my legal rights. I protested this omission of due process, but the officers told me I would have "big trouble" if I didn't sign the statement. I signed, but they refused to give me a copy, saying, "You read it, you signed it, you should know what's in it."
Based on that statement the Labor Bureau has convicted me in absentia of violating labor laws. They have revoked my work permit, and, thereby, my residence in Taiwan.
As a writer and musician, my life in Taitung has been far from nefarious. My last CD, Ocean Hieroglyphics, is among other things an expression of the beauty of Taitung's coast, and is distributed internationally by Wind Records. I have done a number of pro bono recordings of Aboriginal elders singing their traditional songs. I write regularly for the alternative Taipei weekly POTS, and several of my essays on the predicament of Taiwan's Aboriginals will be published in an international journal this year. Selections of my poems have recently been published in Chinese translation in Taiwan Poetics.
I am in the process of mounting an appeal. But beyond the outcome of this case, the larger issue at stake for Taiwan is that something is seriously amiss when a foreign affairs police officer baldly lies about law enforcement issues to a foreign resident. The travesty is extended further when the Labor Bureau simply takes that offi-cer's evidence as prima facie that I am a criminal, and when their first step is to revoke my working rights, and thereby my residence, in Taiwan.
Taiwan's efforts to gain a place in the international community are contravened if the police force, as an extension of political authority, uses threats and intimidation to enforce a xenophobic or ladder-climbing agenda, and if the administration does not competently process issues relating to the rights of foreign residents.
One would hope that the police and government agencies of this struggling democracy would do their utmost to support creative expression and cultural exchange, rather than undermine them through narrow-mindedness and antiquated labor laws.
Scott Ezell
Dulan, Taitung County
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS