There is a Chinese saying that goes, "The trees may prefer to stay calm, but the wind won't stop blow-ing." This is the best description of the nation's political situation. Most people hope that the political conflict can be handled by the judiciary, and that society can return to normal as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the pan-blue camp has insisted on not abiding by the principles of democracy and the rule of law by staging more protests. The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) and the People First Party's (PFP) legislators held a protest at the Legislative Yuan yesterday against an "illegitimate government," yet another example of the pan-blue camp's unclear strategies and wrongheaded tactics.
The pan-blue camp enjoys a slim legislative majority, and it was not surprising that it chose the legislative floor to obstruct the government. However, the performance of the legislative caucuses showed a more disordered logic. Since they agreed to allow Premier Yu Shyi-kun to deliver his administrative report and receive questions, it was strange that they should then threaten to walk out of, or even dismiss, the meeting. In the morning, pan-blue lawmakers yelled "no truth, no president," called the government "illegitimate" and addressed Yu and his Cabinet members as "Mister" or "Miss" -- instead of by their titles -- but then asked them questions in the afternoon. The morning's shenanigans impressed no one.
When the Legislative Yuan's Procedure Committee met a few days ago, a majority of the KMT and PFP legislators agreed to schedule the premier's report for yesterday, along with a question and answer session. Then they turned around and threatened to boycott his report. What does the pan-blue camp really want? Not even they seem to know.
The KMT's high-ranking members are positive about the outcome of the March 20 election recount, ordering each party division to prepare for a possible new election next year. This amounts to disrespect for judicial independence, since the Taiwan High Court has yet to reach a verdict. If the court rules out a new election, the KMT and the PFP will look like fools. Of course, they already made themselves look foolish by first billing a tour by KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
In choosing either to accept or reject the results of the election that gave the Chen Shui-bian (
The Democratic Progressive Party is committed to promoting its political achievements in the run-up to the year-end legislative elections, while the pan-blues focus on a superficial boycott in a bid to capture the media spotlight. If they want to take a more constructive approach, they should work toward creating an effective legislative system that can monitor and act as a counterbalance to the executive branch and leave the debate over the election results in the hands of the judicial authorities.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS