There is a Chinese saying that goes, "The trees may prefer to stay calm, but the wind won't stop blow-ing." This is the best description of the nation's political situation. Most people hope that the political conflict can be handled by the judiciary, and that society can return to normal as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the pan-blue camp has insisted on not abiding by the principles of democracy and the rule of law by staging more protests. The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) and the People First Party's (PFP) legislators held a protest at the Legislative Yuan yesterday against an "illegitimate government," yet another example of the pan-blue camp's unclear strategies and wrongheaded tactics.
The pan-blue camp enjoys a slim legislative majority, and it was not surprising that it chose the legislative floor to obstruct the government. However, the performance of the legislative caucuses showed a more disordered logic. Since they agreed to allow Premier Yu Shyi-kun to deliver his administrative report and receive questions, it was strange that they should then threaten to walk out of, or even dismiss, the meeting. In the morning, pan-blue lawmakers yelled "no truth, no president," called the government "illegitimate" and addressed Yu and his Cabinet members as "Mister" or "Miss" -- instead of by their titles -- but then asked them questions in the afternoon. The morning's shenanigans impressed no one.
When the Legislative Yuan's Procedure Committee met a few days ago, a majority of the KMT and PFP legislators agreed to schedule the premier's report for yesterday, along with a question and answer session. Then they turned around and threatened to boycott his report. What does the pan-blue camp really want? Not even they seem to know.
The KMT's high-ranking members are positive about the outcome of the March 20 election recount, ordering each party division to prepare for a possible new election next year. This amounts to disrespect for judicial independence, since the Taiwan High Court has yet to reach a verdict. If the court rules out a new election, the KMT and the PFP will look like fools. Of course, they already made themselves look foolish by first billing a tour by KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
In choosing either to accept or reject the results of the election that gave the Chen Shui-bian (
The Democratic Progressive Party is committed to promoting its political achievements in the run-up to the year-end legislative elections, while the pan-blues focus on a superficial boycott in a bid to capture the media spotlight. If they want to take a more constructive approach, they should work toward creating an effective legislative system that can monitor and act as a counterbalance to the executive branch and leave the debate over the election results in the hands of the judicial authorities.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS