It is unfortunate that China is only intensifying efforts to damage Taiwan's interests. A few weeks ago, Beijing blocked Taiwan's participation as an observer in the World Health Assembly, an action that flies in the face of the idea of "medicine without borders." Now it is returning to another well-worn tactic: interfering with Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China.
On numerous occasions China has used its media outlets to warn Taiwanese businesspeople against supporting the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or face the consequences.
Last year, Chi Mei Group chairman Hsu Wen-lung (許文龍), a firm supporter of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), announced he would consider resigning from his post as a presidential advisor due to pressure from China. Then, three weeks ago, he resigned as group chairman.
In light of all this, it is risible that the Chinese government is wining and dining Chen Yu-hao (
Beijing frequently uses Taiwanese businesspeople of disrepute as tools with which to attack the government and the Taiwanese business community. Conversely, it wants nothing to do with businesspeople of good standing in the marketplace. Yet tactics of this nature are unlikely to win the hearts and minds of the Taiwanese people.
The "intelligence" Beijing has gathered from some of Taiwan's "old guard" -- dejected politicians, some businesspeople, old soldiers and retired intelligence agents -- amounts to little more than hyperbole. At best, it has been used to concoct clumsily one-sided stories.
Yet the Beijing authorities treasure this information and employ it in their efforts to develop important policies. Not surprisingly, all sorts of mistakes have resulted from this.
When, as in this case, ham-fisted political decisions intrude upon good economic management, it is little wonder that Beijing continues to force Taiwanese public opinion toward independence. How could one blame Taiwanese people for drawing a line in the sand and supporting "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait, hoping that their children can live a life free of totalitarian rule?
Beijing's victimizing of pro-DPP businesspeople is, paradoxically, good news for Taiwan. It brings into ever sharper relief the nature of China's evolving communist system. Taiwan's economy will bleed less and unemployment rates will drop as reputable enterprises are shut out of the Chinese market. China's excessively political intervention in economic activity will also weaken its currency.
Reputable and competitive enterprises need not succumb to this behavior. Instead, local enterprises can choose to set up factories outside China. There may be no other option for self-respecting businesses wishing not to associate with bankrupt opportunists of Chen Yu-hao's ilk and the people who employ him.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS