It is unfortunate that China is only intensifying efforts to damage Taiwan's interests. A few weeks ago, Beijing blocked Taiwan's participation as an observer in the World Health Assembly, an action that flies in the face of the idea of "medicine without borders." Now it is returning to another well-worn tactic: interfering with Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China.
On numerous occasions China has used its media outlets to warn Taiwanese businesspeople against supporting the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or face the consequences.
Last year, Chi Mei Group chairman Hsu Wen-lung (許文龍), a firm supporter of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), announced he would consider resigning from his post as a presidential advisor due to pressure from China. Then, three weeks ago, he resigned as group chairman.
In light of all this, it is risible that the Chinese government is wining and dining Chen Yu-hao (
Beijing frequently uses Taiwanese businesspeople of disrepute as tools with which to attack the government and the Taiwanese business community. Conversely, it wants nothing to do with businesspeople of good standing in the marketplace. Yet tactics of this nature are unlikely to win the hearts and minds of the Taiwanese people.
The "intelligence" Beijing has gathered from some of Taiwan's "old guard" -- dejected politicians, some businesspeople, old soldiers and retired intelligence agents -- amounts to little more than hyperbole. At best, it has been used to concoct clumsily one-sided stories.
Yet the Beijing authorities treasure this information and employ it in their efforts to develop important policies. Not surprisingly, all sorts of mistakes have resulted from this.
When, as in this case, ham-fisted political decisions intrude upon good economic management, it is little wonder that Beijing continues to force Taiwanese public opinion toward independence. How could one blame Taiwanese people for drawing a line in the sand and supporting "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait, hoping that their children can live a life free of totalitarian rule?
Beijing's victimizing of pro-DPP businesspeople is, paradoxically, good news for Taiwan. It brings into ever sharper relief the nature of China's evolving communist system. Taiwan's economy will bleed less and unemployment rates will drop as reputable enterprises are shut out of the Chinese market. China's excessively political intervention in economic activity will also weaken its currency.
Reputable and competitive enterprises need not succumb to this behavior. Instead, local enterprises can choose to set up factories outside China. There may be no other option for self-respecting businesses wishing not to associate with bankrupt opportunists of Chen Yu-hao's ilk and the people who employ him.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS