It is unfortunate that China is only intensifying efforts to damage Taiwan's interests. A few weeks ago, Beijing blocked Taiwan's participation as an observer in the World Health Assembly, an action that flies in the face of the idea of "medicine without borders." Now it is returning to another well-worn tactic: interfering with Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China.
On numerous occasions China has used its media outlets to warn Taiwanese businesspeople against supporting the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or face the consequences.
Last year, Chi Mei Group chairman Hsu Wen-lung (許文龍), a firm supporter of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), announced he would consider resigning from his post as a presidential advisor due to pressure from China. Then, three weeks ago, he resigned as group chairman.
In light of all this, it is risible that the Chinese government is wining and dining Chen Yu-hao (
Beijing frequently uses Taiwanese businesspeople of disrepute as tools with which to attack the government and the Taiwanese business community. Conversely, it wants nothing to do with businesspeople of good standing in the marketplace. Yet tactics of this nature are unlikely to win the hearts and minds of the Taiwanese people.
The "intelligence" Beijing has gathered from some of Taiwan's "old guard" -- dejected politicians, some businesspeople, old soldiers and retired intelligence agents -- amounts to little more than hyperbole. At best, it has been used to concoct clumsily one-sided stories.
Yet the Beijing authorities treasure this information and employ it in their efforts to develop important policies. Not surprisingly, all sorts of mistakes have resulted from this.
When, as in this case, ham-fisted political decisions intrude upon good economic management, it is little wonder that Beijing continues to force Taiwanese public opinion toward independence. How could one blame Taiwanese people for drawing a line in the sand and supporting "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait, hoping that their children can live a life free of totalitarian rule?
Beijing's victimizing of pro-DPP businesspeople is, paradoxically, good news for Taiwan. It brings into ever sharper relief the nature of China's evolving communist system. Taiwan's economy will bleed less and unemployment rates will drop as reputable enterprises are shut out of the Chinese market. China's excessively political intervention in economic activity will also weaken its currency.
Reputable and competitive enterprises need not succumb to this behavior. Instead, local enterprises can choose to set up factories outside China. There may be no other option for self-respecting businesses wishing not to associate with bankrupt opportunists of Chen Yu-hao's ilk and the people who employ him.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS