On May 20, under the leadership of its chairman, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) began its second four-year period in government. With this historical choice, the people of Taiwan have affirmed Chen's slogan "believe in Taiwan, persist in reform" and put an end to the longstanding nightmarish monopolization of Taiwan's politics and economy by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We therefore believe there is a national consensus reaching across party lines that Chen's most important task, apart from consolidating national security, national defense and diplomacy, is to actively work toward improving the economy.
Taiwan's economy is certain to face a challenging international economic environment in the 21st century. The nation should unite and be flexible in response to sudden future changes. Given its control over resource allocation, Chen's government should make particular preparations for and propose strategies capable of leading the nation in the face of challenge and generating good economic results.
Facing the immediate international situation, Taiwan should first of all prepare for stiff competition resulting from economic globalization. Every nation, industrialized or developing, does its utmost to promote economic growth, and even the communist world is now casting off its rigid "-isms" and dogma and is turning to market economics. The government is responsible for proposing strategies to deal with Taiwan's survival and development in the face of global competition. We believe that one important economic issue Chen and his government must deal with is proposing a global economic strategy for Taiwan as it becomes integrated into the international community.
Taiwan cannot hide its head in the sand for ideological reasons, but must identify with Asia and accept the fact that China is finally about to take over from Japan as Asia's biggest economic power. Where does Taiwan position itself in this changing situation? And, in particular, the 2008 timetable for writing a new constitution is certain to intensify cross-strait tension. What will the resulting situation be? These are challenges to Taiwan's economy.
Furthermore, the question of whether Chen's new government will be able to consolidate public trust in the economy will be crucial to building a soaring Taiwanese economy. It is therefore necessary to review and affirm the key importance of economy and human resources. People with economic talent cannot all be trained in one fell swoop, and talented individuals are not at anyone's beck and call. Trampling over talent is a terrible waste of resources and a loss for the society.
It is generally recognized that the DPP's talent structure is tilted toward law and politics and that the party lacks expert economic talent. A responsible party should pay long-term attention to the training of economic talent.
The public's view of the importance a party attaches to the economy and its ability to solve economic problems is an important part of building social trust. This is an area where the Chen government has to change. Be it the
When it comes to the DPP's performance in the economic arena, I remember when I, Chen, Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), Lu Hsiu-yi (盧修一), Yeh Chu-lan (葉菊蘭), Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) and 16 other DPP members were first elected to the legislature 14 or 15 years ago. During the first legislative session, Chen Shui-bian served as caucus whip, and I served as convener of the caucus' budget team, writing the "DPP Caucus 1990 Budget White Paper." This was the first important step toward the opposition's participation in the national budget review, where we attacked the government from the point of view of resource allocation. At the time, this won a certain level of recognition among the middle class.
During the second legislative session, Hsieh served as caucus whip. I served as convener of the caucus' finance and economics group, where I planned a series of public hearings called "Diagnosing Taiwan's Economy." Participants included several well-known scholars and 30 of Taiwan's most outstanding economic experts. In the conservative environment of the time, this group changed the way many people viewed the DPP.
I was also responsible for creating the hearing report for the caucus. At 11 hearings over three months, we gave Taiwan a first peek at the DPP's attempts at diagnosing the national economy. Many of these experts have later gone on to become important members of Chen's government and national policy team. Three years later, Hsu Tien-tsai (
Looking back at the difficulties during these pioneering days, I cannot help hoping that the DPP will be able to build on the spirit of its days in opposition, when, despite its weakness, the party managed to gain a correct understanding of Taiwan's social economy.
I also hope the DPP will be able to remember that during those early days it could only rely on its influence in the legislature to impress the party's potential on the public. Gradually building wide public support on that foundation, it then finally defeated the KMT to become the ruling party.
The government must now respect the promises it made when asking for voter support during the presidential election campaign. It must respect the importance of the economy and human resources, listen to public complaints and accept the advice of industry and academia.
The DPP should use the huge executive system and its resource distribution power to build wealth and create benefits for the nation and its people, while staying true to its early political aims.
Peng Pai-hsien chairs the Taiwan Professors Association's (
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS