Taiwan's diplomatic predicament can't be resolved overnight, nor can cross-strait relations. As each administration is elected for four years, time limits influence decision-makers' long-term strategies. As domestic, Chinese, cross-strait, regional, and international situations are in flux, I propose a strategy of adaptation and enhancement (
This strategy actively faces and responds to changing US, European and Japanese attitudes toward Taiwan by rebuilding mutual trust and delivering a positive message worldwide regarding the consistency and predictability of Taiwan's political reforms, diplomacy and China policies.
"Soft power" is a useful concept here, denoting a collaborative force that seeks to win friendship and support from other countries. Conversely, "hard power" is a punitive force that aims to pressure other countries to advance foreign policies. The two greatly differ in their effectiveness, and the former has become an important diplomatic resource since Taiwan's democratization.
Some say soft power must be defined vaguely, but it is a simple concept that embraces all non-military and non-punitive forces, including a nation's culture, political system, education, ideology, economic perspective, competitiveness, technological creativity, transparency, outward investment and foreign economic aid.
US soft power has often been examined in terms of that nation's successful political, economic and higher educational systems as well as its technological innovation. But is soft power only for major powers? Not necessarily. Research has revealed that the former Soviet Union and today's Singapore have both successfully used soft power. Appropriate planning allows any country, regardless of size or ideology, to usefully employ this strategy.
How to implement soft power? This always begins with interior affairs, as clean politics, a developed economy, and an orderly society serve to attract other countries and obtain recognition from the international community.
Second, soft power requires new ideas. Next, these ideas must be integrated with public diplomacy, agenda-setting and system establishment; thus soft power's exercise and development are necessarily tied to international communication. Finally, soft power depends on a nation's ability to serve as a role model representing progress and other positive influences capable of gaining other countries' attention and respect. There are no shortcuts to soft power, as it can only begin with internal reforms.
In the face of Chinese tactics to diplomatically isolate Taiwan, confrontation will merely "yield half the results with twice the effort" (
Next we have to define our goals, such as enhancing interaction between Taiwan and other nations and increasing Taiwan's participation in international organizations. We should pursue pragmatic goals reflecting international realities as well as Taiwan's strengths. This is a win-win strategy, since soft power attracts recognition by improving domestic affairs. Soft power can add strengths, images, and ideas to traditional diplomacy.
Singapore has used soft power to transform itself into a global society by stressing its unique development. Singapore's effective integration and exercise of soft power is a useful lesson for Taiwan's diplomatic efforts.
Lin Bih-jaw is the vice president of National Chengchi University and the director of the Institute of International Relations at the school.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS