Taiwan's diplomatic predicament can't be resolved overnight, nor can cross-strait relations. As each administration is elected for four years, time limits influence decision-makers' long-term strategies. As domestic, Chinese, cross-strait, regional, and international situations are in flux, I propose a strategy of adaptation and enhancement (
This strategy actively faces and responds to changing US, European and Japanese attitudes toward Taiwan by rebuilding mutual trust and delivering a positive message worldwide regarding the consistency and predictability of Taiwan's political reforms, diplomacy and China policies.
"Soft power" is a useful concept here, denoting a collaborative force that seeks to win friendship and support from other countries. Conversely, "hard power" is a punitive force that aims to pressure other countries to advance foreign policies. The two greatly differ in their effectiveness, and the former has become an important diplomatic resource since Taiwan's democratization.
Some say soft power must be defined vaguely, but it is a simple concept that embraces all non-military and non-punitive forces, including a nation's culture, political system, education, ideology, economic perspective, competitiveness, technological creativity, transparency, outward investment and foreign economic aid.
US soft power has often been examined in terms of that nation's successful political, economic and higher educational systems as well as its technological innovation. But is soft power only for major powers? Not necessarily. Research has revealed that the former Soviet Union and today's Singapore have both successfully used soft power. Appropriate planning allows any country, regardless of size or ideology, to usefully employ this strategy.
How to implement soft power? This always begins with interior affairs, as clean politics, a developed economy, and an orderly society serve to attract other countries and obtain recognition from the international community.
Second, soft power requires new ideas. Next, these ideas must be integrated with public diplomacy, agenda-setting and system establishment; thus soft power's exercise and development are necessarily tied to international communication. Finally, soft power depends on a nation's ability to serve as a role model representing progress and other positive influences capable of gaining other countries' attention and respect. There are no shortcuts to soft power, as it can only begin with internal reforms.
In the face of Chinese tactics to diplomatically isolate Taiwan, confrontation will merely "yield half the results with twice the effort" (
Next we have to define our goals, such as enhancing interaction between Taiwan and other nations and increasing Taiwan's participation in international organizations. We should pursue pragmatic goals reflecting international realities as well as Taiwan's strengths. This is a win-win strategy, since soft power attracts recognition by improving domestic affairs. Soft power can add strengths, images, and ideas to traditional diplomacy.
Singapore has used soft power to transform itself into a global society by stressing its unique development. Singapore's effective integration and exercise of soft power is a useful lesson for Taiwan's diplomatic efforts.
Lin Bih-jaw is the vice president of National Chengchi University and the director of the Institute of International Relations at the school.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS