Since the March election we have become used to interpreting everything the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) says through the filter of Orwellian 1984-style doublespeak -- "war is peace," that sort of thing.
Take KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (
This "don't read my lips" interpretation has recently had heavy usage. For example, readers might remember how in the election's immediate aftermath the riots were predictably called "peaceful protests" by "dissatisfied voters" who actually were blue rent-a-mobs.
We were told that it was of the utmost urgency to speed the recount, so urgent that declaration of a state of emergency was suggested. What this was shown to mean was that the pan-blues would try every gambit they could find to drag their feet on getting the recount under way, even down to the world's richest political party saying it could not afford the NT$60 million bond it had to hand over to the court to make sure it wouldn't default on the case's cost if it were required to pay.
We were told that the pan-blues were only interested in fairness, meaning that they were not interested in fairness but only in making sure that their patrician "right to rule" went unchallenged by the democratic hoi polloi. We were told they wanted to "get to the truth" of the March 19 shooting, only to find out quite clearly that this meant "to believe any wacky conspiracy theory, even in the face of the evidence provided by the specialist whom we ourselves insisted investigate the case."
KMT doublespeak reached its apogee at the inaug-uration. The slogan, remember, was "Taiwan, we continue to move forward," which really meant "We want to go back to the Chiang family dictatorship." In his speech at the pan-blue rally that day, Lien told supporters: "What we care about here is not winning or losing, but about right and wrong," which in Lien-speak means his right to be president and the wrong of anybody else's having the job.
Lien also said he would work to integrate the pan-blues "as one big family," which means that by merging the KMT with the People First Party (PFP) he could keep his job by plying on the widespread loathing in the KMT for the man who would take over if he were toppled: PFP Chairman James "Chung-hsing Bills" Soong (宋「興票」楚瑜). And we were told that the pan-blue meeting was a spontaneous rally of supporters, and of course found that many KMT members only attended because they were ordered to.
So far the "understand the opposite of what is said"tactic has served us well. Even on Saturday, as the party claimed that it had no intention of trying to kick out pro-localization members, we understood that this was exactly what Lien and the KMT leadership had in mind, egged on by the anti-localization PFP.
How then are we to interpret Saturday's remarks by spokeswoman Kuo Su-chun (
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS