At last, our politicians are going to give us a more entertaining show. Many political observers are treating the merger between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) as though it were a jubilant wedding.
People can cast aside their fear of a contagious "political depression" for a while and have a spree at the wedding party. They can pop in to the KMT's and PFP's houses and see how the bride and groom get through the wedding. It's a chance to have some fun! The entertainment value is high and chances like this are rare. To get amusement out of the political arena is like squeezing a flattened tube of toothpaste: you can rarely get anything out.
High-ranking officials in the KMT and PFP want to merge the parties, but grumbling sounds can be heard from the rank and file. Some PFP members have described the KMT as an ailing groom who wants a festive wedding to wash away bad luck. The KMT has retorted that the PFP has shown itself prone to extramarital affairs. In response, the PFP has taken exception to the KMT's party-assets scandals that a merger would embroil them in, leading the KMT to snipe back that the PFP behaves like a petty gossip complaining about the future brothers-in-law before marrying into a big family.
Even though they have nothing but contempt for each other, they still spruce themselves up to be married. A farce is about the begin as they set out upon the red carpet. The farce will make the audience burst into laughter and tears because of its absurdity.
Viewing this farce in a sensible light, we know an incompatible couple will make for a painful marriage. A Taiwanese slang phrase is "pissing on sand, you only pile up the stench." It might not be very refined, but it vividly portrays the two parties' current situation. How can urinating on a heap of sand help consolidate it? When the KMT and the PFP together spread speculations about vote-rigging and a "faked" shooting, their relationship presented a smooth surface.
Yet, after sand is mixed with reeking urine, not only does it not consolidate into a firm heap, but it also becomes scarred and pock-marked, and has a lot of little lumps. In the argument over the merger bill, a KMT internal force led by Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) can no longer provide gracious support for KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) to lean on.
Other splinter groups in the KMT's localization faction have disliked the PFP from the start. Now the conflicts are out in the open. Even PFP Vice Chairman Chang Chao-hsiung (張昭雄) swore never to convert to the KMT. So far, the greater the effort put into merging the parties, the further apart they seem to become.
If the KMT and the PFP fail to find a reliable cement to fortify their sand castle, they will repeat the folly of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party: a string of divorces and remarriages. Unlike Japan's LDP, the KMT and the PFP are facing a rapidly growing party that holds power. Perhaps, as a PFP legislator who wore sunglasses on the day of the merger announcement said, "it's getting dark."
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY WANG HSIAO-WEN
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS