"The Marines have landed, and the situation is well in hand."
These were the words of the war correspondent Richard Harding Davis in 1885. Marines worldwide are known as much for their intense institutional pride -- some call it arrogance -- as they are for their fighting abilities.
Taiwan's Marines are no less proud than their counterparts elsewhere, and according to US House Resolution 437, in which two congressmen proposed asking Taiwan to send 5,000 Marines to Iraq, the Republic of China Marine Corps has a "deserved reputation throughout the Far East for their high level of training and motivation."
This may be true, but regardless of their reputation, sending Taiwan's Marines to Iraq would be folly of the first order. The idea has all the hallmarks of a creative political strategy destined for tactical failure. In short, it is worse than useless.
If representatives Dana Rohrabacher and Jim Ryun sincerely want to boost the US' relationship with Taiwan, they should propose something a little less provocative and a little more realistic.
Neither the US' nor Taiwan's interests would be served by sending Taiwan's military to participate in the coalition's effort in Iraq. What both countries do need is a Taiwanese military capable of credibly defending Taiwan. Politicians come and go, but foreign policy blunders are forever.
A far better idea would be to start sending large numbers of Taiwan's junior and mid-level officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs) to attend the various war and staff colleges in the US.
This is not because Taiwan is incapable of training its own personnel, but rather because the US' commitment to provide for Taiwan's defense under the Taiwan Relations Act is vital to Taiwan's survival. And for the US to successfully assist in the defense of Taiwan requires two things: making sure that Taiwan is able to defend itself during the initial stages of a Chinese assault, and ensuring that Taiwan can successfully carry out combined arms operations, possibly in concert with the US and whatever allies decide to lend a hand (read: Japan).
Taiwan's ability to defend itself during the initial stages of an attack has been called into question by many military observers. According to a host of reports, Taiwan will be qualitatively surpassed by the People's Liberation Army in the next few years. So, what better way to signal that the US and Taiwan are committed to defending the nebulous "status quo" -- which is anything but -- than to have the US provide extensive training to Taiwan's military?
Furthermore, joint force and combined arms operations -- that is, different types of combat units working together to achieve the same goal -- are not to be taken lightly. Combat units in the US spend hundreds of training hours practicing joint ops. It requires a great deal of training and practice to effectively carry out combined arms operations.
It is difficult to coordinate thousands of disparate units on a battlefield of moderate proportions, even when they speak the same language and use much of the same equipment, and it doesn't take much to imagine how difficult joint combat operations between Taiwanese and US forces would be in the Taiwan Strait or, God forbid, in Taiwan itself.
The US regularly conducts joint training operations with dozens of nations, but it isn't likely that Taiwan will be invited to any major regional joint-training operations in the near future. The next best thing would be to have Taiwanese service members -- especially junior officers and NCOs -- training alongside their US counterparts in professional military courses on a large scale.
Don't send Taiwan's Marines to Iraq. Send them to the Amphibious Warfare School in Quantico, Virginia.
Mac William Bishop, a former US Marine, is an editor at the Taipei Times.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS