Taiwan has had one of the world's highest Cesarean-section rates for the past decade, but the government has done little to redress the situation. The preliminary results of a recent large-scale study commissioned by the Department of Health (DOH) should be used to help map out new policies. If the government, the medical profession and academics already agree on the need to reduce the number of C-sections, which direction should our policies go?
Improving the overall medical service system, rather than just blaming pregnant women would be the most effective way to cut the number of C-sections.
The DOH study once again found that "previous cesarean" is the main reason for the high C-section rate. Media reports have noted a widespread misconception that one Cesarean delivery would necessitate C-sections in future pregnancies and therefore, women do not try natural childbirth for subsequent births. But are there doctors who share this misperception? According to research findings, only a handful of doctors in this country are willing to perform "vaginal birth after Cesarean sections," or VBAC. The DOH survey showed that Taiwan's VBAC rate is less than than 5 percent.
As more studies are done on the behavior of pregnant women, shouldn't we also try to understand doctors' approaches and the difficulties they face in practicing VBAC? At the same time, can medical circles study VBAC and improve its technologies?
The survey also showed that Taiwan has a high percentage of women with an abnormal fetal position or breech presentation -- three or four times higher than that of Western countries. News reports quoted researchers as saying "breech presentation" might be used by doctors to apply for national health insurance payments. Can the Taiwan Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology probe such false declarations by doctors?
As for other reasons cited for C-section, such as women's fear of labor pains, has the medical system adopted measures to help women cope with labor pains? Is the handling of labor pains the focus of obstetric departments?
What about the "superstition theory" that has been cited for over a decade? There have been headlines reading, "Seventy percent of pregnant women choose [auspicious] timing." But looking at the questionnaire used in the recent survey, it turns out the original question was: "Do you think it is common for Taiwan's newborns to be delivered at a time chosen [by parents]?" Seventy percent of the respondents replied "common" or "very common" to the question. This is society's perception of pregnant women, not the reason why they "choose" C-sections.
A 1995 public-health study was interpreted as meaning half of C-sections were performed for the sake of auspicious timing. This became one of the main reasons cited to explain the high C-section rate. However, the women interviewed 10 years ago cited medical reasons for wanting a C-section, and "auspicious timing" was merely an "added value" after doctors had confirmed the need for a C-section. It was not the key reason for the operation, although a handful of healthy women did decide to have the operation for reasons of timing.
If all the studies over the years are correctly interpreted, they would show that the timing is definitely not a major reason. Why does the public still blame superstition as the reason for Cesareans? More must be done to reform the medical system and eliminate the misconception that superstitious pregnant women are demanding Cesareans.
Wu Chia-ling is an associate professor of sociology at National Taiwan University. Liu Chung-tung is a professor of medical sociology at National Defense Medical Center.
Translated by Jackie Lin
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS