It was clear from last Saturday's election debate that the nation's politicians have learned little about democracy. Even though presidential candidates and the political parties enjoy full freedom of speech, they have never abided by democratic rules or paid much attention to the law. Politicians use negative propaganda strategies to attack their opponents but rarely do they base their claims on solid evidence. Such irresponsible accusations can be heard on a daily basis. No wonder the media has compared the campaign to a mud-slinging war between wild kids.
Over the past week or so, the opposition parties and legislators have quoted from letters by a fugitive tycoon that called the Presidential Office a hub of "black gold" politics and insinuated that some high-level members of that office were involved in corruption. Then the opposition seized on first lady Wu Shu-chen's (
It is the responsibility of the opposition to monitor the government. The problem, however, is that since the opposition is making such serious accusations, voters expect it to produce concrete evidence and lodge complaints with the judiciary so that the judicial system won't be tarnished and social justice may be upheld.
But the opposition has not done this. The accusations remain at the level of verbal accusations. When the Presidential Office said it would file defamation lawsuits against its accusers, these people were quick to change their tune, claiming that they were simply quoting from information provided by the fugitive tycoon. They are neither willing to take responsibility for their words nor apologize.
Such behavior is disappointing.
The nation's democracy cannot continue to be built on the basis of mud-slinging. What political parties say should be checked and balanced by the media. Voters must also responsibly use their ballots to help put an end to negative campaigning so that errant parties and politicians may learn a lesson from this year's presidential election.
To ensure that Taiwan's democracy continues to develop on the right track, we urgently need a new constitution compatible with the current reality to lead the nation's political development and to free it from the shackles of the past. Constitutional reforms will help rebuild the people's confidence in the judiciary. This will have a deterrent effect on law-breaking political parties and politicians.
Without a new constitution, the development of Taiwan's democracy will be endangered and the judiciary will once again be subject to political interference. If the democratic system is not strengthened, fugitives such as Chen Yu-hao (
If Taiwan does not continue to deepen and stabilize her democratic foundations, if political parties stop at nothing to tarnish their opponents or sow discord in society, then ethnic hostilities may worsen and any effort at nation building will come to nought. Taiwan needs to deepen its democratic system to consolidate social unity and public opinion and promote ethnic harmony and national identity.
Such an effort is needed to prevent white-collar criminals from committing more mischief. Only then can Taiwan have the conditions it needs to undertake judicial and legislative reforms. Only then can a democratized Taiwan resist external threats and enjoy true stability and peace.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS