It was clear from last Saturday's election debate that the nation's politicians have learned little about democracy. Even though presidential candidates and the political parties enjoy full freedom of speech, they have never abided by democratic rules or paid much attention to the law. Politicians use negative propaganda strategies to attack their opponents but rarely do they base their claims on solid evidence. Such irresponsible accusations can be heard on a daily basis. No wonder the media has compared the campaign to a mud-slinging war between wild kids.
Over the past week or so, the opposition parties and legislators have quoted from letters by a fugitive tycoon that called the Presidential Office a hub of "black gold" politics and insinuated that some high-level members of that office were involved in corruption. Then the opposition seized on first lady Wu Shu-chen's (
It is the responsibility of the opposition to monitor the government. The problem, however, is that since the opposition is making such serious accusations, voters expect it to produce concrete evidence and lodge complaints with the judiciary so that the judicial system won't be tarnished and social justice may be upheld.
But the opposition has not done this. The accusations remain at the level of verbal accusations. When the Presidential Office said it would file defamation lawsuits against its accusers, these people were quick to change their tune, claiming that they were simply quoting from information provided by the fugitive tycoon. They are neither willing to take responsibility for their words nor apologize.
Such behavior is disappointing.
The nation's democracy cannot continue to be built on the basis of mud-slinging. What political parties say should be checked and balanced by the media. Voters must also responsibly use their ballots to help put an end to negative campaigning so that errant parties and politicians may learn a lesson from this year's presidential election.
To ensure that Taiwan's democracy continues to develop on the right track, we urgently need a new constitution compatible with the current reality to lead the nation's political development and to free it from the shackles of the past. Constitutional reforms will help rebuild the people's confidence in the judiciary. This will have a deterrent effect on law-breaking political parties and politicians.
Without a new constitution, the development of Taiwan's democracy will be endangered and the judiciary will once again be subject to political interference. If the democratic system is not strengthened, fugitives such as Chen Yu-hao (
If Taiwan does not continue to deepen and stabilize her democratic foundations, if political parties stop at nothing to tarnish their opponents or sow discord in society, then ethnic hostilities may worsen and any effort at nation building will come to nought. Taiwan needs to deepen its democratic system to consolidate social unity and public opinion and promote ethnic harmony and national identity.
Such an effort is needed to prevent white-collar criminals from committing more mischief. Only then can Taiwan have the conditions it needs to undertake judicial and legislative reforms. Only then can a democratized Taiwan resist external threats and enjoy true stability and peace.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS