The announcement by President Chen Shui-bian (
Many tend to judge the matter from an election perspective. In view of Taiwan's long-term development, it in fact has brought the nation two major benefits to this point. The key to success lies in how we handle what comes next.
The significance of the nation's democratization is that the people enjoy sovereignty and independence. Taiwan is a de facto independent country. The sovereignty of the Republic of China (ROC) is the same as that of Taiwan. However, there are different views on the issue.
Some people celebrate the sovereignty of the ROC, not that of Taiwan -- though, most countries recognize neither Taiwan nor the ROC as a sovereign entity. The referendum makes a significant stride in manifesting the nation's sovereignty domestically and internationally.
Internationally, even though the US and Japan do not support Chen's decision to hold the referendum, they both sent prominent figures here to discuss the matter. This, as well as China putting pressure on Taiwan through the US, makes the "Taiwan issue" an international matter. This is remarkable progress.
Domestically, the referendum has provoked much debate. Debate is a form of discussion and communication which is conducive to building consensus. When most people revealed their desire for the right to vote in a referendum (although not as soon as Mar. 20), even the pan-blue legislators who opposed the Referendum Law (公民投票法) at first had to support it. This marks progress in the strengthening of the nation's sovereignty.
Still, we need to recognize the reality that although holding a referendum represents a form of democracy and fits the so-called universal values promoted by powers like the US, Taiwan's democratic movement is not welcomed in the international community. Obviously it is not necessarily okay to do what is right.
As a country in a weak position, Taiwan must be flexible. But this does not mean that we need to put up with whatever happens to us. Wisdom rather than tolerance is what we need in our dealings with big countries.
Both the US and China are using Taiwan as a bargaining chip. Provided that Taiwan constantly acts like a "good kid" who silently accepts oppression from powerful nations, it will eventually be sacrificed by them.
Usually, children who nag their parents for candy will eventually get some. So Taiwan has played its cards correctly by making a lot of noise about having a referendum.
Yet Taiwan cannot act arbitrarily or in disregard of the consequences.
Once the attempt to hold a referendum is made known in the international community, moderate measures should be taken to change Taiwan's position from that of a "determinee" -- a country whose fate is determined by others -- to a "participant" that makes decisions in the US-China-Taiwan relationship.
Amid the referendum uproar, US President George W. Bush reportedly sent an envoy here to ask the government to "do him a favor." If this is true, Taiwan can use this to bargain.
The international community recognizes the right of people here to vote in a referendum but does not want it to happen. Under such circumstances, the people should be pacified with some "candy" in return. The candy can be allowing Taiwan to be part of a free trade area, the World Health Organization and so on.
Chen's attempt to show his loyalty to the US was made very obvious upon his announcement of the referendum questions. It is worth observing whether Chen's concession was meant to alleviate the pressure on his re-election bid or to obtain more bargaining power.
Many people look at the two referendum questions with a mocking attitude. They think of them as a big joke as there is no need to hold a referendum on those two issues. But why don't we calm down and think?
It is because of the pressure imposed by the international community that the referendum questions are confined to such an extent that the people do not even have real freedom of expression.
Therefore, if we look at the issue from the perspective of fighting for international status for Taiwan, the referendum's symbolic significance far outweighs its functional significance. As long as Taiwan takes the unprecedented step of holding a referendum, neither the US nor China can easily ignore the will of the Taiwanese public.
Historically, accomplishments in democracy, human rights and national independence take 30, 50 or even 100 years. People who pursue sovereignty should know that such a goal cannot be reached in a single stride.
Small countries formerly under the Soviet Union did not walk down the path of autonomy and democracy until Russia was bogged down in an economic quagmire and security threats no longer existed.
Taiwan must seek international support so as to continue the fight. The weak cannot survive only on the basis of their reasoning but instead have to assess how much room they have to maneuver, what price they have to pay for "making trouble" and whether they can afford that price.
Fortunately, unlike Chechnya, and East Timor before its independence, Taiwan is already an independent country, not enslaved by external powers. The problem is that the international community does not recognize Taiwan and not enough consensus has been reached within the country.
It took the US 75 years after its civil war to agree on its identity. East Timor claimed independence with almost 80 percent public support. As Taiwan has spent 50 years on its way to an independent entity, we need to do more to achieve internal integration and consensus.
If there is no agreement within the country, how can we seek international support?
Teng I-jan is a Wealth Magazine columnist. The original Chinese text of this article appeared in the February issue of the magazine.
Translated by Jennie Shih
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS