Numerous security analysts have expressed concern about the campaign to reform Taiwan's military. To be sure, Taiwan's defense reforms are being accompanied by growing pains, but these difficulties should not be exaggerated.
Taiwan is making some headway in its drive to reorganize and restructure the national defense system, add more advanced weapons to the military's arsenal, downsize force levels, streamline its force structure and a series of other measures designed to create a small but elite armed forces. One of the chief objectives of the restructuring of the defense establishment is to reinforce the principle of civilian leadership and promote the nationalization of the armed forces. The reorganization program might be described as a success.
In the past, Taiwan made some unsound choices with respect to arms acquisitions, but it is inaccurate for critics to charge that Taiwan is hesitating to purchase arms because it hopes to be a "free rider."
A variety of considerations prompted Taiwan to postpone purchases of US submarines, warships and planes. As Taiwan is now a democracy, major arms purchases have to be approved by lawmakers, which can be a time-consuming process.
Moreover, defense issues -- particularly major arms acquisitions -- are now subject to widespread discussion and debate in Taiwanese society. This means that the media, interest groups and other actors may all play a role in the procurement process. In addition, the defense ministry must follow certain legal procedures when acquiring armaments and the procurement process is much more institutionalized and transparent.
An evaluation of a possible arms purchase could take more than 22 months. In addition to changes in the procurement process, the global economic slowdown has contributed to a slowdown in arms purchases. Further complicating things, spending on social programs is accelerating.
To state it succinctly, Taipei is experiencing real difficulties purchasing all the weapons that it hopes to add to its inventory due to budgetary constraints. Ironically, some of the present procurement problems may be traced to the past policies of the US.
During the early to mid-1990s, Taiwan sought to purchase a variety of expensive weapons platforms from the US. At the time, Taipei had the money to spend. Rather than sell submarines or other state-of-the-art weapons systems to Taiwan, however, Washington refused to sell the equipment or sold what one US Congressional study described derisively as "Model-Ts."
Consequently, Taiwanese lawmakers have argued that the US must share part of the blame for the growing military imbalance across the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan is making some progress in downsizing the military, strengthening its C4ISR (command, control, communication, computer, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) system and enabling the three military branches to function as a team.
US advisers are helping the military enhance its C4ISR system and Lockheed Martin Tactical Systems reportedly signed a deal to provide datalinks and other elements of an integrated C4ISR system to Taiwan in December.
It is clear that Taiwan is making some real headway in its campaign to reform its armed forces.
According to defense officials, during the next 10 years Taiwan's military will become an entirely new force. Despite this progress, however, it is true that Taiwan's military also continues to confront significant challenges.
It must overcome these obsta-
cles to be prepared to counter China's military build-up and its increasingly hostile posture toward Taiwan.
Dennis Hickey is professor of political science and university fellow in research at Southwest Missouri State University.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS