Numerous security analysts have expressed concern about the campaign to reform Taiwan's military. To be sure, Taiwan's defense reforms are being accompanied by growing pains, but these difficulties should not be exaggerated.
Taiwan is making some headway in its drive to reorganize and restructure the national defense system, add more advanced weapons to the military's arsenal, downsize force levels, streamline its force structure and a series of other measures designed to create a small but elite armed forces. One of the chief objectives of the restructuring of the defense establishment is to reinforce the principle of civilian leadership and promote the nationalization of the armed forces. The reorganization program might be described as a success.
In the past, Taiwan made some unsound choices with respect to arms acquisitions, but it is inaccurate for critics to charge that Taiwan is hesitating to purchase arms because it hopes to be a "free rider."
A variety of considerations prompted Taiwan to postpone purchases of US submarines, warships and planes. As Taiwan is now a democracy, major arms purchases have to be approved by lawmakers, which can be a time-consuming process.
Moreover, defense issues -- particularly major arms acquisitions -- are now subject to widespread discussion and debate in Taiwanese society. This means that the media, interest groups and other actors may all play a role in the procurement process. In addition, the defense ministry must follow certain legal procedures when acquiring armaments and the procurement process is much more institutionalized and transparent.
An evaluation of a possible arms purchase could take more than 22 months. In addition to changes in the procurement process, the global economic slowdown has contributed to a slowdown in arms purchases. Further complicating things, spending on social programs is accelerating.
To state it succinctly, Taipei is experiencing real difficulties purchasing all the weapons that it hopes to add to its inventory due to budgetary constraints. Ironically, some of the present procurement problems may be traced to the past policies of the US.
During the early to mid-1990s, Taiwan sought to purchase a variety of expensive weapons platforms from the US. At the time, Taipei had the money to spend. Rather than sell submarines or other state-of-the-art weapons systems to Taiwan, however, Washington refused to sell the equipment or sold what one US Congressional study described derisively as "Model-Ts."
Consequently, Taiwanese lawmakers have argued that the US must share part of the blame for the growing military imbalance across the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan is making some progress in downsizing the military, strengthening its C4ISR (command, control, communication, computer, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) system and enabling the three military branches to function as a team.
US advisers are helping the military enhance its C4ISR system and Lockheed Martin Tactical Systems reportedly signed a deal to provide datalinks and other elements of an integrated C4ISR system to Taiwan in December.
It is clear that Taiwan is making some real headway in its campaign to reform its armed forces.
According to defense officials, during the next 10 years Taiwan's military will become an entirely new force. Despite this progress, however, it is true that Taiwan's military also continues to confront significant challenges.
It must overcome these obsta-
cles to be prepared to counter China's military build-up and its increasingly hostile posture toward Taiwan.
Dennis Hickey is professor of political science and university fellow in research at Southwest Missouri State University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS