Numerous security analysts have expressed concern about the campaign to reform Taiwan's military. To be sure, Taiwan's defense reforms are being accompanied by growing pains, but these difficulties should not be exaggerated.
Taiwan is making some headway in its drive to reorganize and restructure the national defense system, add more advanced weapons to the military's arsenal, downsize force levels, streamline its force structure and a series of other measures designed to create a small but elite armed forces. One of the chief objectives of the restructuring of the defense establishment is to reinforce the principle of civilian leadership and promote the nationalization of the armed forces. The reorganization program might be described as a success.
In the past, Taiwan made some unsound choices with respect to arms acquisitions, but it is inaccurate for critics to charge that Taiwan is hesitating to purchase arms because it hopes to be a "free rider."
A variety of considerations prompted Taiwan to postpone purchases of US submarines, warships and planes. As Taiwan is now a democracy, major arms purchases have to be approved by lawmakers, which can be a time-consuming process.
Moreover, defense issues -- particularly major arms acquisitions -- are now subject to widespread discussion and debate in Taiwanese society. This means that the media, interest groups and other actors may all play a role in the procurement process. In addition, the defense ministry must follow certain legal procedures when acquiring armaments and the procurement process is much more institutionalized and transparent.
An evaluation of a possible arms purchase could take more than 22 months. In addition to changes in the procurement process, the global economic slowdown has contributed to a slowdown in arms purchases. Further complicating things, spending on social programs is accelerating.
To state it succinctly, Taipei is experiencing real difficulties purchasing all the weapons that it hopes to add to its inventory due to budgetary constraints. Ironically, some of the present procurement problems may be traced to the past policies of the US.
During the early to mid-1990s, Taiwan sought to purchase a variety of expensive weapons platforms from the US. At the time, Taipei had the money to spend. Rather than sell submarines or other state-of-the-art weapons systems to Taiwan, however, Washington refused to sell the equipment or sold what one US Congressional study described derisively as "Model-Ts."
Consequently, Taiwanese lawmakers have argued that the US must share part of the blame for the growing military imbalance across the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan is making some progress in downsizing the military, strengthening its C4ISR (command, control, communication, computer, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) system and enabling the three military branches to function as a team.
US advisers are helping the military enhance its C4ISR system and Lockheed Martin Tactical Systems reportedly signed a deal to provide datalinks and other elements of an integrated C4ISR system to Taiwan in December.
It is clear that Taiwan is making some real headway in its campaign to reform its armed forces.
According to defense officials, during the next 10 years Taiwan's military will become an entirely new force. Despite this progress, however, it is true that Taiwan's military also continues to confront significant challenges.
It must overcome these obsta-
cles to be prepared to counter China's military build-up and its increasingly hostile posture toward Taiwan.
Dennis Hickey is professor of political science and university fellow in research at Southwest Missouri State University.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS