With charges of dirty tricks flying between the pan-green and pan-blue camps and allegations rolling out from business circles in the midst of the election campaign, the public has gradually been made aware of the relationship between politics and business. What they have seen might be just the tip of the iceberg.
Given today's campaign methods, an enormous amount of money must be spent on TV commercials, print propaganda mobilizing supporters to attend campaign rallies, broadcasting campaign activities and setting up campaign headquarters. The cost is probably much higher than each camp has admitted.
Recently exposed allegations and scandals involve hundreds of millions of NT dollars. Two scenarios are running at the same time now -- "business acquiring government" and "politics controlling business."
If this happened in the US, what would the result be? The answer is that it would not happen. This does not mean US politicians are not corrupt. It means the US' system has limited their freedom to misbehave.
US candidates must declare the political donations they have received. If they fail to do this, they are faced with lawsuits. Naturally those who break the law would have to retire from the political arena.
But in Taiwan, whether one breaks the law depends on one's own definition and whether one has to leave the political arena is one's own choice. Such a big gray area should make US politicians jealous in the extreme.
The US' Lobby Law stipulates that politicians must fill out forms after meetings with representatives of interest groups to record the time and place of the meeting and the issues discussed.
This is the only way to rein in corruption. But in Taiwan, business conglomerates have various channels through which they can meet with important government officials.
Former US vice president Al Gore was criticized for making calls from his White House office to raise funds. To be frank, the people of Taiwan are very envious of such a "scandal." Comparing that with the allegations of corruption in our presidential campaign, it is clear that, although our referendum laws are more "democratic" than those in the US, our democracy still has a long way to go.
Emile Sheng is an associate professor of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95
RSS