In less than three months we will know which of you will challenge US President George W. Bush. But for the moment, I am addressing this letter to all of you. I am very eager to have your ear, the ears of your trusted advisers, and most importantly, of the American people. I hope that you will attach some importance to this message.
You all feel, I suspect, that the world is in the grip of growing anti-Americanism. But this is not completely true. I am writing this as a citizen of the world; I have not consulted anyone, but I do not believe that I will be contradicted. America's global leadership is politically and militarily incontestable. It is therefore a fact.
From a cultural point of view, there are in the world today three claims to global leadership: from China, from the Muslim world, and from the West. Because Europe was stupid enough to self-destruct in two world wars, the West's claim to world leadership belongs to you, the Americans.
The fact that today the US, under the authority of an imperfectly elected administration, exercises this leadership in a dangerous way is not enough to change our minds on this point. We -- the overwhelming majority of the citizens of the world -- believe that only a true democracy is capable of occupying this position of leadership. Faced with other claims and alternatives, we are all pro-American.
But the Bush administration scares us. The concept of preventive war is poised to incite precisely that clash of civilizations which was predicted a decade ago and which must be avoided. The Muslim faith counts a billion men and women among its followers. Five percent of them have declared war on our civilization and are ready to engage in murder in order to put an end to Western domination. Ninety-five percent of Muslims, including most of their religious leaders, want only to live in peace and to put an end to the long humiliation of Islam that only the advent of democracy and development in the Muslim world can make possible.
Terrorism must be fought by separating these two parts of the Muslim world, rather than bringing them together. At stake is the security of mankind.
Things are going badly in the world, and America cannot fix all the problems by itself. Bush's unilateral withdrawal from all of the world's major negotiations today -- about disarmament, nuclear proliferation, the elimination of tax havens siphoning resources from socially responsible countries, international organized crime, climate change, the UN role in maintaining peace and the fight against poverty in Africa and elsewhere -- aggravates the host of risks that hang over the planet that we all inhabit.
Many of us realize and understand that America's fantastic economic success -- a success story that has lasted for more than a century -- has made you scarcely interested in the rest of the world, particularly during your electoral campaigns. Although the rest of the world, for a variety of reasons, has not been able to equal your material success, this is not a reason for jealousy. But the fact of America's uninterest in the rest of the world is a cause for anxiety.
The world's problems will become worse unless attended to, and they will inevitably affect your government. You will need the support, the trust and the friendship of others. Why not innovate, then, by bringing the world and its issues into your electoral campaign? At least two-thirds, if not three-quarters, of the inhabitants of this planet hope for peace, security and sustainable development -- and because of that for a negotiated solution to our global conflicts.
All of you carry this hope. In a few months, there will be only one of you left, the man who will challenge Bush this November. But his cause will be common to millions, indeed, billions of people around the world. The support of the majority of humanity can be an essential argument in your electoral campaign. Those who look to you to take up their cause are an almost countless legion.
In the name of civilization, you have no right to lose.
Michel Rocard, former prime minister of France and leader of the Socialist Party, is a member of the European Parliament.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Palauan President Surangel Whipps Jr in a letter to an unnamed US senator on Feb. 9 said that China has offered to “fill every hotel room,” in Palau, “and more if more are built” if the small island nation were to break ties with Taiwan. The letter further claims that China offered US$20 million per year for the creation of a “call center” in Palau, a nation whose economy relies heavily on tourism. It is more evidence that for China, tourism is an economic tool for its political gain. Cleo Paskal, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, posted
Due to enduring the Kafkaesque situation of having two accidents in 30 minutes, one involving an accident with an ambulance, I would like to share my personal experience. Both cases show the loopholes of Taiwanese law, which is a driving factor for the terrible traffic conditions in the nation. I was driving my scooter on the main road in Taoyuan’s Yangmei District (楊梅). Despite there being no cars behind me, a young man in an old car made a sudden left turn and I bumped into his vehicle. At first, the man tried to run away, but was blocked by other
It has been a year since China relaxed the “zero COVID-19” measures that had been stifling economic activity, but the country has yet to experience the rebound that policymakers and pundits anticipated. Instead, economic indicators from last year have painted a disheartening picture. The fallout from the massive property developer Evergrande’s 2021 collapse is far from over, and the sector continues to struggle, even after the Chinese government relaxed purchasing restrictions in cities like Guangzhou and Shanghai. China’s financial health has also declined as local government debt has snowballed, leading Moody’s to downgrade the country’s credit outlook in December last year.
Beijing’s diplomatic offensive highlighted by Lin Tzu-Yao (林子堯) and Cathy Fang in a recent op-ed (“Beijing’s new diplomatic offensive,” Feb. 7, page 8) is nothing new, as were the authors’ unwarranted smears on Taiwan’s major opposition party. They peculiarly meshed together a wide array of talking points to try to put an innocent face on president-elect William Lai (賴清德), concealed behind the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) failure to manage cross-strait relations and ties with diplomatic allies. They also attempted to discredit anyone who dares to oppose the DPP’s imagination-based politics. It was most unfortunate that the authors deliberately misconstrued parts of Taiwanese