Mohammed Khan yearns to visit his uncle, who left the hamlet of Udoosa in Indian Kashmir for Pakistan more than a decade ago. The trip should be easy: a half-hour descent through paddy fields and lemon and orange groves followed by a 800m walk along the road above the Jhelum River would get him to a bridge which begins in India and ends in Pakistan.
Khan's problem is not geography, but history. The state of Kashmir is claimed by both India and Pakistan, and they have fought three wars over it since it was split between them in 1947.
"It is in the hands of these two big countries. The road has been closed ever since I can remember. The last kilometer on our side is mined and the Pakistanis used to shell the bridges and not let people cross," said Khan.
But a flurry of diplomatic initiatives between India and Pakistan, most notably a ceasefire last month on the de facto border known as the Line of Control, have raised hopes that the highway would be opened after more than half a century. The ceasefire was agreed in advance of a visit to Pakistan by India's prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, for a summit of South Asian countries starting Sunday.
Udoosa is situated on a hillside pitted with semi-abandoned villages and blasted homes which have borne the brunt of decades of cross-border animosity. Opposite are the snow-capped peaks and dizzying gorges of the Jhelum Valley. There nestles the last Indian artillery position, just ahead of a two-meter-high, barbed-wire security fence being erected by the Indian army to prevent armed militants crossing into India. Beyond lies Pakistan.
"That village is with Pakistan," Khan said, pointing to a series of small houses dominated by a low-slung building topped with a green dome.
"All these years we could hear nothing but the shelling. Now we hear the azaan [the Muslim call to prayer] from their mosque. I will be very happy if the road opens next," he said.
Built by the British at the end of the 19th century, the highway is the only all-weather road in the region and runs 125km from Srinagar, the capital of the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir.
Once the main route to Kashmir from central Asia and beyond, the road was blocked to hold back Indian forces at the start of the 1947 war between India and Pakistan. Now the traffic is thick with army trucks ferrying soldiers to their bases.
Nineteen kilometers from the line of control and Udoosa, along a dirt track, is Uri, the last big town before Pakistan. It seems everybody in Uri has a story of being unable to attend a family wedding or a funeral across the border. Obtaining a Pakistani visa is difficult and making the lengthy journey via New Delhi is expensive.
"I have never met my three uncles in Pakistan, only seen them in pictures," said Ajaz Ahmed, who runs a cake shop in the town.
"In 1947, my father was left behind in the rush of partition by his family. He only went to see his brothers in 1985 but they have never been able to come here and I have never been able to go there. I could not even visit when one uncle died," he said.
If Pakistan and India agree to open the road, many in Uri hope that not only will people from both sides be able to cross freely, but that trade will resume between Srinagar and Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistani Kashmir.
"Fruit is a big industry in Kashmir and if the road opens we could sell our apples and oranges in Pakistan," said Mushtaq Ahmed Lone, a businessman.
"Before 1947, this used to be the main commercial hub of the region, and it could be again if the road opens," he said.
Such hopes rest on both countries continuing on the path to peace as well as taking the three months required to remove land mines and spread tarmac. The rapprochement between the two is remarkable, given that they came close to war little more than a year ago.
Kashmir stands to gain the most from any reconciliation. Its people have endured 14 years of violent conflict between Indian security forces and armed Muslim separatists, who slip easily between Pakistani and Indian Kashmir. No Kashmiri family has escaped unscathed. Officially, since 1989, when the insurgency began, 30,000 people have been killed, but human rights groups say the figure is at least double that.
In the last year, the election of a new chief minister for Indian Jammu and Kashmir has seen the violence decrease, but police records show nearly 2,900 people have been killed.
For all the talk of progress, life at the other end of the highway in Srinagar is bleak. The city does not look like the capital of a state that is part of the world's largest democracy. Armed soldiers are everywhere: behind sandbags, at roadblocks and being carried on lorries. The rough methods employed during some of the army's operations have provoked anger, which in turn has fueled the insurgency in Kashmir.
"The army and the paramilitary forces act with impunity. They cannot be prosecuted without sanction from the Indian government and this is only given in a very small number of high-profile cases," said Pervez Imroz, a human rights lawyer in Srinagar.
At the recent funeral of a local chemist, Sartaj Ahmad, who was buried in the graveyard of martyrs in Srinagar, dozens of young men shouted slogans against Indian rule.
The chemist was one of two men, unconnected to any separatist movement, to be shot dead by Indian security forces in the poor district of Boatman colony on the northern outskirts of Srinagar after a gun battle between the army and an Islamist.
Such incidents, described as "regrettable" by the army, help create a culture of suspicion in Kashmir which leads many to harbor doubts that peace can ever be achieved through negotiations and confidence-building measures such as opening the road to Muzaffarabad.
"The question is about whether these things are sincerely meant and whether peace is achievable," said Abdul Aziz Dar, who was a leading member of the militant group Hizbul Mujahideen, but who renounced violence after 10 years in Indian jails.
"If not they will be seen as just part of a political game," he said.
A failed teenage suicide bomber, Mohammed Imran is a pitiful sight. Tears well up in the young man's eyes as he speaks of his time herding buffalo in the Pakistani village of Gujranwala.
Now in an Indian jail in Srinagar, the 18-year-old illiterate rues the day this summer he fell under the spell of a preacher from the radical Islamic group, Lashkar-e-Toiba, at a mosque.
"He gave a very emotional speech about the atrocities carried out against Muslims in Kashmir," he said.
"About how women were being mistreated and raped and how the Indian army entered mosques with their shoes on," he added.
With few opportunities open to an uneducated boy, waging a holy war against India could be justified spiritually and financially.
Mohammed was paid 5,000 rupees to sign up as a fedayeen whose only mission in life is death.
"My family home has three rooms for seven people. We have no television, only buffaloes."
After giving the cash to his father, a landless laborer, Mohammed said he was given three months of training at a camp over the border. There he learned to use guns and grenades, despite the camp being raided by the Pakistani army. Along with 13 other young recruits and led by a militant from Lashkar, he stole across the line of control a few weeks ago through the thick forests which grow between Kashmir's mountain ranges.
"To become a martyr is the most beautiful thing to happen to a mojahed," he said. But the teenager did not die for the cause.
While his three companions launched an attack on the main Indian camp in Kashmir, which lasted three days and left six men dead, Mohammed was gripped by fear and fled.
"My death was not supposed to happen that day, martyrdom was not in my fate," he said.
"I was ready to die but the devil took hold of my heart that day," he said.
Mohammed ran away and took refuge in an abandoned house. Discovered by a Kashmiri man who promised to save him, Mohammed found himself instead delivered into the hands of the Indian army.
He said he was tortured while in custody -- beaten with rifle butts, given electric shocks and had a gun placed against his chest and told he was about to die.
"I vomited blood and I was preparing myself for death, but it never came," he said.
His fate is uncertain -- he cannot easily return to Pakistan unless there is an amnesty. He could languish in Indian jails for the rest of his life.
"I do not know what will happen but I know that Kashmir does not need me," he said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS