America, the land that gave the world Coca-Cola, Titanic and the Marlboro Man, is having a hard time selling itself.
The government's public relations drive to build a favorable impression abroad -- particularly among Muslim nations -- is a shambles, according to lawmakers from both parties, State Department officials and independent experts. They say the effort, known as public diplomacy, lacks direction and is starved of cash and personnel.
Washington has failed to capitalize on the ouster of former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, these critics say, and did not maintain the sympathy generated by the Sept. 11 attacks. In Iraq, occupation officials routinely blame their miscalculations on pessimistic American news media, a reflex that even some hawks denounce as deceptive.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Public diplomacy is "a complete and utter disaster in Iraq," said Mark Helmke, a senior staff member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who holds that the occupation authority has done little to counter criticism that it is an imperial, occupying force. "We have four different agencies running media operations there. There's no coordination, no strategy."
A senior State Department official, who is active in public diplomacy, says he starts his day pondering the antipathy to the US.
"Why, in Jordan, do people think Osama bin Laden is a better leader than George Bush?" he asked. "It's not just Arabs who are angry with the United States. It's worldwide."
Nearly two years ago, the Bush administration, hoping to tap the expertise of the private sector, hired Charlotte Beers, a Madison Avenue advertising whiz, as officials built their case for war with Iraq. After producing a feel-good video about Muslims in the US, which was rejected by some Arab nations -- and even scoffed at by some State Department colleagues -- Beers retired in March, citing health reasons.
Now, the administration is turning to an old government hand, Margaret Tutwiler. A former State Department spokeswoman and former ambassador to Morocco, it falls to her to convey the administration's intentions in the Middle East and elsewhere and to counter the virulent anti-Americanism that fosters terrorism.
As she settled into her offices this month, Tutwiler offered only a terse comment: "I hope that I am able to contribute to the overall public diplomacy efforts of our government."
The enthusiasm over her arrival is widespread. Colleagues said they expected her to ask Secretary of State Colin Powell, one of the administration's most popular figures, to embark on a "listening tour" in crucial Muslim nations.
Of course, nothing persuades like success. Some administration officials insist that tempers from Jakarta to Jidda will start to cool if security is established in Iraq and leadership is transferred.
The capture of Saddam, and the announcement by the Libyan leader, Muammar Qaddafi, that he will forswear unconventional weapons evinces a grudging respect for the administration's military strategy, but even some hard-liners voice doubts about the plan and how it is being promoted. Robert Novak, a syndicated columnist, recently cited the need for an overhaul of the American leadership in Iraq and "an end to the deceptive public relations favored by the inner circle at the Pentagon."
Some foreigners say all the fretting is overblown. Hesham El Nakib, a spokesman for the Egyptian Embassy in Washington, says that even the term "anti-Americanism" is too harsh.
"To say that it is like a wildfire is an overstatement," he said. "There are some resentments from the policies here and there."
Still, there is general agreement that the US rarely gets credit for the support it provides, especially in the Middle East. Nakib acknowledges that the average Egyptian may not be aware that the US is an ally that provides nearly US$2 billion in aid each year.
Many Muslims say that US policy favors Israelis over Palestinians and needs to be altered before sentiments will change. James Zogby, the president of the Arab American Institute, says the standoff weighs heavily throughout the Arab world. "The policy issues have taken a toll," he said.
Some Americans exploring ways to improve public diplomacy say they have been astonished by the depth of feeling on that issue.
"I was really shocked by the level of animosity over our policies toward Israel and the Palestinians, even in places like Turkey," said James Glassman, a journalist and resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, who served on a congressionally mandated advisory panel that toured the region this year.
Beyond the policy questions, experts say the American outreach has been hampered by inattention and the challenge of a changing world. These are among the problems they cite:
-- America's interlocutors in the Muslim world are increasingly seen as the backers of bankrupt regimes. For decades, the US looked to an elite, older generation of decision-makers -- judges, journalists, lawyers -- to cast US policies sympathetically. The younger generation has little connection with the US, beyond a taste for its fashions and entertainment.
-- Security concerns have undercut face-to-face diplomacy. Many American diplomats spend their days in fortress-like embassies and rely on secondhand accounts. One French diplomat recalled that an Arabic-speaking American envoy based in North Africa begged off from meetings with local residents because he was forbidden to leave his compound at night.
-- There is a lack of cultural knowledge of the Muslim world. Americans tend not to study Arabic and other languages and traditions of predominantly Muslim countries, preventing them from presenting their policies directly to people.
-- The State Department has had a back seat to the Pentagon in public diplomacy. The occupation destroyed, then took over the Iraqi national television station. A defense contractor, SAIC, hired to run the operation, broadcast on the same frequency used by the widely ridiculed Iraqi Ministry of Information; the contractor's contract will not be renewed, officials said.
-- Congress and successive administrations have cut the budgets for public diplomacy in recent years. A Republican-led reorganization folded the US Information Agency -- which included the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe -- into the State Department, reducing its number of employees by 40 percent.
"Our government probably made a mistake when they abolished USIA," said Representative Frank Wolf, who voted for the State Department reorganization in 1998. "Right now, we're not very successful in telling the good news."
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS