The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) criminal usurpation and looting of state assets during its long rule in Taiwan have once again surfaced. After the KMT's Lien Chan (
In the run-up to the 2000 election, then independent presidential candidate James Soong (
But after the Chung Hsing Bills Finance embezzlement scandal was exposed, he lost the reformist facade he had worked so hard to create.
Depending on the China ideologists in the KMT core and the local politicians with whom he had built a relationship during his terms as provincial governor was not enough to win the presidential election.
Now Soong and his erstwhile political rival Lien have teamed up for the upcoming election. Does Soong still pretend to be a reformer?
How does he respond to the KMT's usurpation and robbery of state assets? Of course, he is now left with only one choice -- joining forces with Lien.
The KMT has one renowned member, Ma Ying-jeou (
Unlike Soong, Ma is immune to any repercussions from political persecution cases such as the Kaohsiung Incident or the Chen Wen-cheng (
But how should Ma defend his party, as it once again has to face social criticism regarding its looting of state assets? How should he keep himself out of trouble?
Soong's betrayal of the KMT allowed him to pretend to hold up the banner of reform.
But since Ma, the KMT's poster boy and future star, belongs to the party, can he claim that his party is dirty while he himself is clean? Serving as the chief of the Lien-Soong campaign headquarters, he has to bear all the burdens of not only the KMT but also of Lien and Soong.
The KMT is its own worst enemy, and there is no way it can rid itself of such an enemy. Nor can Ma break away from such an inexorable fate. What blocks the KMT's restoration to power is not just the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, but also the force of justice. That force leaves society a slim chance of survival and brings Taiwan boundless hope.
Lee Min-yung is a poet and president of the Taiwan Peace Foundation.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means