The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the pan-blue camp have each launched propaganda campaigns over the family assets of the other's leader.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) recently released a TV commercial titled "Do you like it? Papa can't afford it." The ad centers on President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chen hails from a poor farmer's family. He relied on his own hard work to overcome the circumstances of his birth and become a head of state. His life story is material for an inspirational book.
Chen's family assets have increased in recent years, but only by a small amount -- a far cry from the wealth amassed by certain individuals and conglomerates by means of financial privilege and insider trading.
The first family's every move is subject to public scrutiny, and people expect the first family to be role models, especially in the education of its children. Unfortunately the first couple violated a big taboo by buying a Jaguar for their son, who had just graduated from college, as a graduation gift.
The commercial's use of Chao Yi-an is the sort of thing that will make most Taiwanese very uncomfortable. First of all, involving an infant in a political struggle seems very low. Second, the ad misrepresents a phrase from Hoklo, more commonly known as Taiwanese. The Taiwanese phrase simply means "precious grandson" and has nothing to do with the precious metal. Many Taiwanese use "golden grandson" to describe their grandsons. Chen's family is no exception.
The DPP quickly responded with a TV commercial titled "Do you like it? Papa will `a' it for you." [Note: "a" is Taiwanese slang word meaning "steal."] The ad describes how the family of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) amassed great wealth. Lien's grandfather, Lien Heng (連橫) was a poor writer, but the family's fortunes increased as Lien's father, Lien Chen-tung (連震東), took up a string of government posts. The media estimates that the Lien family's wealth amounts to NT$20 billion.
Yesterday, the DPP also released 500,000 copies of a booklet describing how Lien Chen-tung collaborated with businesspeople to strike it rich when he was a civil servant. The booklet shows solid attention to detail based on painstaking research and investigation. It should make good material for future study of corrupt politics in the KMT era.
Under the KMT's rule, there was no differentiation between party coffers and government coffers, and party assets were treated almost like family assets. There have been reports about high-ranking KMT government officials buying real estate in the US.
For example, Allen Soong (
Any veteran journalist will remember how Lien Chan's wife, Lien Fang-yu (
The Liens and Soongs grew rich through KMT corruption. We can only hope that on March 20 Taiwanese do not do not let these thieves, by retaking power, reinstate the impunity they exploited so well in the past.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS