Following the release of a Chinese policy paper on direct cross-strait links, China's civil aviation administration has launched a push for direct links, spearheaded by its Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office.
The push echoes the campaign platform of the Lien-Soong clique, which has promised direct transportation links within a year or two if elected.
As for the businesspeople of Taiwan, whose primary concerns are economics and transportation, a sugar-coated direct-links offensive from China that does not involve "one China" can better win their sympathy and votes than can the "one-way" and "indirect" transportation links of President Chen Shui-bian's (
From the perspective of protecting Taiwan, the A-bian (
We cannot ignore national security simply to curry favor with Taiwanese businesses.
When it comes to defining flight routes, China favors the term "cross-strait routes."
Negotiations are conducted in the private sector, between professional associations or companies; China views the Taiwanese government as it views Hong Kong and Macau -- as special administrative regions -- ignoring Taiwan's sovereignty. Taiwan cannot accept this.
China has made it clear that the negotiations will not touch "one China." In fact, giving up on government-to-government talks will reinforce the "one China principle" -- the claim that Taiwan is a part of China.
If direct links are agreed to through negotiations under the ground rules, Taiwan will have given up its sovereignty and national defense. Taiwan's military will not be able to intervene in cross-strait traffic. It will be no different from opening up air and sea territories to the enemy.
At 11pm on Aug. 20, 1968, a Soviet civilian aircraft complained of a malfunction while flying over Prague and made a forced landing at Ruzyme airport, 15km away from the city center. After the landing, the aircraft did not stop on the runway or evacuate its passengers. Instead, it taxied at high speed and crashed into the apron of the terminal building. Armed members of the Soviet 103rd Guards Desant Division poured out of the plane. Within a few minutes they had captured the flight control tower. The airport guards became prisoners before they could respond.
Air control personnel from the rapid attack force directed Soviet transport planes, which had been circling in the sky, to land at the rate of a plane per minute.
Once Taipei City's Sungshan Airport is used for cross-strait flights, the scenario described above could happen in Taiwan.
Military transport planes using civilian flights as cover in the first wave of attack can evade radar and prevent early responses from anti-aircraft fire.
In addition, ground control personnel cannot be sure what passenger planes are carrying. Air force fighters and anti-aircraft missile units dare not make assumptions or shoot down the planes. Troops guarding the airport cannot use their weapons.
If direct flights are to come about, Taiwan must insist on "curved-line direct links" that fly through air space whose traffic is controlled by a third country.
Taiwanese businesspeople must remember that Taiwan is their motherland. Once sovereignty is lost or Taiwan becomes a part of China, Taiwanese businesses in China will no longer be a rare commodity.
Huang Yao-ming is a member of the board of directors of the Coconut Tree Foundation.
Translated by Francis Huang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
RSS