With the presidential election race reaching a new level of intensity, with all the heavyweights taking turns stumping for the candidates they support, two incidents occurred recently that highlight the need for some members of the government to remain neutral and bipartisan through the insanity of the election campaign.
On Wednesday, a Chinese-language newspaper reported a story about a guest lecturer openly making very demeaning remarks -- supposedly a joke -- about the president during a class at the Ministry of National Defense.
Reportedly, he showed a picture of President Chen Shui-bian (
Worse yet, according to the newspaper, the people in the class - -- all military officers -- - cheered and clapped in response to the so-called "joke" about the commander in chief.
The reported response of the officers in question, if true, indicates some very fundamental problems within the military.
Unlike during the martial law era, when people were required to deify the country's leaders, today, as in all other democratic countries, the performance of the president is subject to examination and critique. Naturally, members of the armed forces should be entitled to choose the political parties they support in their private capacities, but while in the military - -- at least while attending public military functions - -- some fundamental respect for the commander in chief must be maintained. Otherwise, it is very difficult for the commander in chief to do his job.
Thanks to decades of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, during which members of the military were brainwashed into devoting loyalty not only to their country but also to the party, the military remains predominantly pan-blue.
This raises the worrisome question of how well the military can remain neutral in sensitive times such as presidential elections.
If the military supports any party, it will have difficulty maintaining loyalty to the person elected in the event that he or she is not the candidate they had supported. This in turn could lead to a national crisis.
Of course, military personnel are not the only ones who must remain bipartisan. On Wednesday, Executive Yuan Spokesperson Lin Chia-lung (
Lin made the statement after Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
While explaining and defending government policy is the duty of every government official, if this takes place at a campaign rally or other campaign function, it is imperative for government officials such as the minister of justice to stay away.
During a campaign, it is the duty of the Ministry of Justice to crack down on vote-buying. If the minister stumps for any political party, the credibility and the impartiality of the ministry in performing such tasks will surely face serious criticism.
It is fortunate that the Democratic Progressive Party realizes the inappropriateness of such things. Hopefully, all the relevant government officials will from now on have a better grasp of the fact that their duty calls on them to stay neutral at election time.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS