With the presidential election race reaching a new level of intensity, with all the heavyweights taking turns stumping for the candidates they support, two incidents occurred recently that highlight the need for some members of the government to remain neutral and bipartisan through the insanity of the election campaign.
On Wednesday, a Chinese-language newspaper reported a story about a guest lecturer openly making very demeaning remarks -- supposedly a joke -- about the president during a class at the Ministry of National Defense.
Reportedly, he showed a picture of President Chen Shui-bian (
Worse yet, according to the newspaper, the people in the class - -- all military officers -- - cheered and clapped in response to the so-called "joke" about the commander in chief.
The reported response of the officers in question, if true, indicates some very fundamental problems within the military.
Unlike during the martial law era, when people were required to deify the country's leaders, today, as in all other democratic countries, the performance of the president is subject to examination and critique. Naturally, members of the armed forces should be entitled to choose the political parties they support in their private capacities, but while in the military - -- at least while attending public military functions - -- some fundamental respect for the commander in chief must be maintained. Otherwise, it is very difficult for the commander in chief to do his job.
Thanks to decades of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, during which members of the military were brainwashed into devoting loyalty not only to their country but also to the party, the military remains predominantly pan-blue.
This raises the worrisome question of how well the military can remain neutral in sensitive times such as presidential elections.
If the military supports any party, it will have difficulty maintaining loyalty to the person elected in the event that he or she is not the candidate they had supported. This in turn could lead to a national crisis.
Of course, military personnel are not the only ones who must remain bipartisan. On Wednesday, Executive Yuan Spokesperson Lin Chia-lung (
Lin made the statement after Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
While explaining and defending government policy is the duty of every government official, if this takes place at a campaign rally or other campaign function, it is imperative for government officials such as the minister of justice to stay away.
During a campaign, it is the duty of the Ministry of Justice to crack down on vote-buying. If the minister stumps for any political party, the credibility and the impartiality of the ministry in performing such tasks will surely face serious criticism.
It is fortunate that the Democratic Progressive Party realizes the inappropriateness of such things. Hopefully, all the relevant government officials will from now on have a better grasp of the fact that their duty calls on them to stay neutral at election time.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS