With the presidential election race reaching a new level of intensity, with all the heavyweights taking turns stumping for the candidates they support, two incidents occurred recently that highlight the need for some members of the government to remain neutral and bipartisan through the insanity of the election campaign.
On Wednesday, a Chinese-language newspaper reported a story about a guest lecturer openly making very demeaning remarks -- supposedly a joke -- about the president during a class at the Ministry of National Defense.
Reportedly, he showed a picture of President Chen Shui-bian (
Worse yet, according to the newspaper, the people in the class - -- all military officers -- - cheered and clapped in response to the so-called "joke" about the commander in chief.
The reported response of the officers in question, if true, indicates some very fundamental problems within the military.
Unlike during the martial law era, when people were required to deify the country's leaders, today, as in all other democratic countries, the performance of the president is subject to examination and critique. Naturally, members of the armed forces should be entitled to choose the political parties they support in their private capacities, but while in the military - -- at least while attending public military functions - -- some fundamental respect for the commander in chief must be maintained. Otherwise, it is very difficult for the commander in chief to do his job.
Thanks to decades of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, during which members of the military were brainwashed into devoting loyalty not only to their country but also to the party, the military remains predominantly pan-blue.
This raises the worrisome question of how well the military can remain neutral in sensitive times such as presidential elections.
If the military supports any party, it will have difficulty maintaining loyalty to the person elected in the event that he or she is not the candidate they had supported. This in turn could lead to a national crisis.
Of course, military personnel are not the only ones who must remain bipartisan. On Wednesday, Executive Yuan Spokesperson Lin Chia-lung (
Lin made the statement after Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
While explaining and defending government policy is the duty of every government official, if this takes place at a campaign rally or other campaign function, it is imperative for government officials such as the minister of justice to stay away.
During a campaign, it is the duty of the Ministry of Justice to crack down on vote-buying. If the minister stumps for any political party, the credibility and the impartiality of the ministry in performing such tasks will surely face serious criticism.
It is fortunate that the Democratic Progressive Party realizes the inappropriateness of such things. Hopefully, all the relevant government officials will from now on have a better grasp of the fact that their duty calls on them to stay neutral at election time.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS