When the Web-based political group MoveOn.org announced a contest in October for homemade commercials challenging the Bush administration -- the winner to be shown on TV during the week of the State of the Union address -- grass-roots America proved a willing and eager advertising agency. \nThirty-second spots poured in by the hundreds in e-mail attachments to MoveOn.org, which has already shown that the Internet can be a battering ram for political activism by organizing protests against the invasion of Iraq. Last week, the group posted 1,017 of the amateur commercials on a Web site (www.bushin30seconds.org), asking viewers to pick their favorites. \nIn the first hour of polling on Wednesday last week, more than 5,700 votes were logged. So many people visited the site that MoveOn, experiencing bandwidth problems, limited the curious to 20 ads a day. \nNext month the top vote-getters will be shown to a panel of left-leaning celebrity judges including Moby, Michael Moore, Janeane Garofalo, Margaret Cho and Gus Van Sant, with one or more winning entries to be broadcast as paid advertisements in Washington, in potential swing states or perhaps nationally. \nWhat the cascade of entries demonstrates is that the home-movie revolution made possible by inexpensive digital camcorders and off-the-shelf software has elevated the US from merely being a nation of wedding videographers. \nEven so, the production values of many spots are a bit shaky, and the content often overheated. Bush Cheney Auto World, a typical entry from Houston high-school history teacher Tracy Spaight, posits an oily salesman whose motto is: "Where we always say what you want to hear." \nBut a number of the ads are unexpectedly professional-looking, at least on a par with the burnished style and hard-hitting messages of political ads made by Madison Avenue pros or K Street consultants in untucked shirttails. \nThe amateur ad makers of the left are charged up about the country's dependence on fossil fuels, the plight of education and the US$87.5 billion spending package for Iraq. They tabulate Bush's perceived deceptions. He is "Bushoccio," an inflatable Hot Air President Doll whose box bears the product warning: "Not designed for poor people. Not actually elected." \nContributors to the contest include recent graduates of the Kennedy School of Government, a teacher from Detroit, stand-up comics, amateur impressionists, a DJ and more than a few self-styled rappers. \nSets and props have a quaintly home-grown provenance. Pies and cakes are used to illustrate budget and tax cuts. A pot on the verge of boiling over is Iraq. Water gurgling down a drain is American Credibility. A toilet flushes away Our Children's Future, played in another ad by a fragile US Grade-A egg. \nMovies and TV shows are the ad makers' grist. \n"I'm concerned, George, I'm concerned about how you've dealt with the economy," drones a computer in a spot titled 2004: A Political Odyssey. \nChristopher Fink, an independent filmmaker in California, used his ranch-style house in the San Fernando Valley as a set and recruited his sister as cinematographer after she made an accomplished video of his wife's baby shower. \nIn the spot titled If Parents Acted Like Bush, Fink plays the president as a cad who beds down with special interests. His car pulls away from the house in the morning, leaving his teenage daughter, played by Fink's niece, to find her own way to school. He buys a motorcycle and tells the Terminator-face biker that his daughter will pay for it. \nThen she walks in on him in his bedroom, snuggling with a blonde who isn't her mother. \n"It's OK," he cries, "she's rich!" \nAnd how much did the spot cost? \n"Including catering? That was most of the budget -- the doughnuts," Fink said. \n"It couldn't have cost me more than 50 bucks," he said. \nDonnie Deutsch, a prominent New York advertising executive who worked on the campaign of Bill Clinton in 1992, looked at a sample of the MoveOn ads last week and said he was impressed. \n"I thought some of it was very fresh and interesting -- obviously amateurish in some of its creative license -- but certainly very creative in its thinking," he said. \nHowever, Mike Murphy, a Republican strategist who worked on Arnold Schwarzenegger's campaign for governor of California, was more dismissive. \n"I'd say a lot of this looks like MoveOn self-promotion," he said in a message sent, appropriately enough, by e-mail over his BlackBerry. "Having an insult-the-president home-movie contest is not smart politics," he said. \nThrough its voter fund, which solicits donations online, in part from Web surfers who must register to view the anti-Bush ads, MoveOn aims to raise about $15 million for advertising in battleground states to unseat Bush, said Eli Pariser, who oversees the group's fund-raising. \nIn addition to the amateur ads, MoveOn has a professional agency on retainer. But Pariser said he was so pleased with the ads that have rolled in that MoveOn may approach its 1.7 million members in this country and say, "Here are 10 great ads, and we want to run all of them." \nIt would not be the first time the group has proven the power of the Internet for political activism. Founded five years ago to oppose the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, MoveOn.org became a catalyst for demonstrations earlier this year, and subsequently raised more than US$7 million from 133,000 donors to oppose Bush's policies. Last month, two billionaire philanthropists, George Soros and Peter Lewis, announced they would match contributions to the group up to US$5 million between them. \nThe content of the MoveOn ads is circumscribed by the campaign finance reforms of the McCain-Feingold Law, upheld earlier this month by the Supreme Court. While prohibiting soft-money donations to political parties, the law allows donations to flow to independent groups like MoveOn as long they run only informational ads and do not specifically endorse a candidate. \nThus MoveOn's call for submissions was careful to solicit ads that would help voters "understand the truth about George Bush." No ads supporting the president's policies were sent in, contest organizers noted. They also disqualified about 100 submissions, including some for reasons of taste. A spot showing a frog dropped into boiling water, a metaphor for "how the administration is turning up the heat in this country," according to its director, was deemed unsuitable for TV. \nStill, plenty of the ads that made the cut exhibit the inflamed passions of street rallies. The scenarios are sometimes closer to angry guerrilla theater than witty Saturday Night Live spoofs. A man fills his gas tank, then shoots the cashier instead of paying. \n"If you wouldn't tolerate this from a normal citizen," the screen reads, "why would you from your president?" \nFollow the Leader compares Bush to a schoolyard bully who shoots a schoolmate in the back. Connect the Dots maintains that Bush "has established links to known terrorist organizations." Still another commercial claims he has "ties to the bin Laden family." \nLarry McCarthy, a Republican strategist who in 1988 helped produce a notorious TV ad using a convicted murderer, Willie Horton, to suggest that the Democratic nominee, Governor Michael Dukakis, was soft on crime, has not seen the MoveOn ads, but he admired the idea. \n"It's certainly proof of the march of technology, letting everybody and anybody be an ad maker," he said. \n"As a fund-raiser gimmick, I think it's pretty good," he continued. \n"I wouldn't be surprised if somebody on the Republican side decided that there's just as much or more fodder on Howard Dean, so why don't you let those little Republicans with camcorders have a go at it too?" he added.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is an expert at bluffing and keeping the West on its toes, pushing relations to the edge before pivoting without warning. However, hemmed in and fuming, he is deadly serious about being heard on Ukraine. Those close to the Kremlin said that the Russian president does not want to start another war in Ukraine. Still, he must show he is ready to fight if necessary in order to stop what he sees as an existential security threat: the creeping expansion of the NATO in a country that for centuries had been part of Russia. After years of disillusionment
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) sixth plenary session has ended and from all appearances, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has set the stage to rule for the rest of his life. Some might be tempted to declare that this calls for Xi to do a victory lap, but all is not well on the other side of the Taiwan Strait. To parody a line from Ya Got Trouble, a song from Broadway musical The Music Man: “There’s trouble in River City, (aka, Beijing). Trouble with a capital T, which rhymes with C for CCP.” Why? Taking control of a nation is always much
When analyzing Taiwan-China tensions, most people assume that the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consists of rational actors. Embedded within this belief are three further suppositions: First, Beijing would only launch an attack on Taiwan if it were in China’s national interest; second, it would only attack if the odds were overwhelmingly in its favor; and third, Chinese decisionmakers interpret information objectively and through the same lens as other actors. These assumptions have underpinned recent analyses — including by Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) — concluding that there is no
Frequent incidents of violence in society, such as a near-fatal assault with baseball bats in Taichung and a deadly shooting in New Taipei City, are making people anxious. Media commentators blame police chiefs and mayors, calling for their resignations. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said she would review the situation and take firmer action, such as the Cabinet calling a conference on law and order, and proposing countermeasures, while former New Power Party legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has urged the government to declare “war” on gangsters, and not just as a slogan. When thugs get into brawls and beat up or even kill