The head of the company that produced the Special Report VCDs, Lu Tung-long (
The structural problems in the media, highlighted by the appearance of satirical VCDs, were not created overnight. They date back half a century, to when the Chiang Kai-shek (
In the early days of KMT rule, the newspapers run by Taiwanese, such as the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News and the Independence Evening Post, were frequently raided because they violated political taboos. The Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News was later taken over by pro-unification forces and turned into the KMT's official mouthpiece. It gradually lost its autonomy and competitive edge. After the ban on the press was finally abolished, it could not survive and closed down.
The fate of the Independence Evening Post was equally frustrating. Constant raids caused it to gradually loose its spirit. At the same time, the China Times and the United Daily News, both of which maintained a close relationship with the KMT government, used their abundant political resources to firmly establish themselves as the Taiwanese papers were drawing their last breaths. Fifty years on, we have a situation which has been described as "the media ruling the nation."
Although the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been in power for three years, the media and the cultural empire built by unificationist forces over half a century remains to this day, unshaken. It will be difficult to fight it in the short term.
In fact, many people have long been aware that although unificationists had lost their hold on the government, they were using the media to continue their rule by continuing to brainwash the general public. This is the greatest potential concern for the Taiwanese people in their efforts to build Taiwanese self-awareness.
But what's the use in blaming the unificationists for using the media to protect their identification with China and their ethnic interests? It is only natural for them to use every resource to protect their vested interests. What we really should be asking is what the proponents of localization are doing now that they control ample economic resources.
People in media circles joke that the United Daily News is a genuine "villain," as it directly attacks the localization wave and actively promotes identification with China. The China Times, on the other hand, is a hypocrite, wrapping carefully its political insinuations in more sophisticated language.
Pro-localization forces have finally realized that they must not remain silent in the face of pro-China forces and their constant media barrage, and that it's absolutely useless to try moral persuasion on such people. As a result, they have begun to take action. Not only have they set up Web sites critical of the pro-China media, but they have also produced animated and digital video files and are using the pervasiveness of the Internet to voice the people's anger.
The appearance of the Special Report VCDs is just one minor development, an interlude in the fight against the pro-unification media. If prosecutors really must investigate who lies behind these VCDs, we can give them a clear answer right now: "Every Taiwanese person lies behind these VCDs." The people can no longer tolerate the pro-unification media.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS