In the last presidential election, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) exposed the Chung Hsing Bills Finance case, which caused a dramatic change in the election situation. James Soong (
It is difficult to predict how this politically sensitive case, which is very likely to influence another election, will turn out. If the prosecutors indict Soong before next year's presidential election, then Soong, the People First Party (PFP) and the entire pan-blue camp will use the claim of political persecution as a major campaign strategy. An indictment would be deleterious to the blue camp, because the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government apparently cannot manipulate the prosecutors to either indict him or not.
The public's judgment is already very clear. According to an opinion poll conducted by TVBS on Oct. 24, 53 percent of the public believes Soong has not clarified the matter. Only 16 percent believes he has, while 31 percent has no opinion. The Chung Hsing case is obviously a major test for Soong. It definitely has an impact on the Lien-Soong ticket, but ultimately it is not the most crucial factor.
There are apparently more important factors behind the continuing slide in support rates for the Lien-Soong ticket. In the final analysis, the problem lies with the political characters of Lien and Soong.
The two have been adapting to their roles of presidential and vice presidential candidate. But their basic political characters have not seen any fundamental change. At best, Lien has merely shifted from a gentle appearance to being relatively more abusive. But Lien started heaping abuse on people in the previous election. Soong's criticism of Lien at the time was right on the mark -- he said Lien's special quality is that he does not take any stances on any matter. Soong also stressed that "a person who has no views of his own cannot be a president." Does Lien have any views or stances now? He doesn't, in Soong's eyes, as one can clearly see in Soong's raw obstructionism during the Legislative Yuan's review of Grand Justice nominees in the previous legislative session.
Soong is very domineering, believing that he can control the country by adopting the traditional style of being close to the people. He almost views himself as a wise emperor. He accumulated massive political resources during his days as KMT secretary-general and provincial governor. Many political figures yield obedience to him.
In a democratic era, such an attitude in itself will be faced with a major predicament. The PFP has found it difficult to break free from the predicament of a one-man party. While calling Soong a man with "a wolf's heart and a dog's lungs" in March 2000, Lien also ridiculed his camp as "a small gang talking about being above parties and factions." Soong's single-minded wish to be a wise emperor in a democratic era has a direct bearing on the PFP's failure to widen its scope.
There is a fundamental contradiction in the cooperation between a man with no views and a man with a wolf's heart and a dog's lungs. Even if they win the presidential election, they will not be able to resolve the problems created by such political characters. Lien and Soong need to change their political characters thoroughly if they are really sincere about taking up the heavy responsibility of leading the country.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a professor of sociology at National Taiwan University and a member of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Francis Huang
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS