The late US president Richard Nixon once said that ruling a country is about making choices. An administration that does not make a choice is like a wild horse running around without a direction so it would never reach the end.
Choice means choice of agenda, choice of timing and choice of method. It is common sense to all national leaders that a leader who makes no choices cannot lead, and that without leadership, he cannot rule. His traces may be found all over the map, as Nixon said, but that is merely the illusion of a busy administration. All the hustle and bustle bear no fruit.
If a leader has so many ambitions that he can hardly prioritize them or make plans for them, he would end up carrying out reforms of different natures at the same time. This kind of multi-focus political practice would render him to over-promise and under-perform. Even if he is extraordinarily gifted, he would not be able to finish them all at once.
President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) reforms are usually of a "hit and run" nature, meaning that he withdraws his plans when faced with difficulty. His tactics lack a philosophical backbone, thus, he constantly sways between the extremes of political reality and political theology. He advertised the "middle way" in the early stage of his administration and now he seems to come back to the conventional theological route of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Changing back and forth on the routes proves that he rules the country without making a choice or a clear one.
In the past few months Chen promised that his focus would be on improving the economy. How-ever, the agenda he has created has had nothing to do with economy. He announced his theory of "one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait," a "call Taiwan Taiwan" referendum and plans for a new constitution. As a result, both the ruling and opposition parties forgot about improving the economy. They were all busy fighting over national identity, sovereignty and the Constitution, putting aside what is most relevant to the average person.
Of course, a nation's identity, sovereignty and constitutional system are critical issues that deserve discussion. But these issues cannot be settled over-night. Even if we attempt to solve only one issue at a time, a resolution would not be reached immediately. Not to mention the fact that Chen's agendas arrived like waves, one after another, so that not only the opposition parties but also the ruling party itself could barely handle them.
In governing a country, crisis management is a means, not an end, comprising only part of the administrative process, not the whole. Chen's administration, however, has done nothing but fight one crisis after another. The Cabinet and legislative elite functioned like firefighters. Wherever Chen swept by, there would be fires for them to put off. The fires sometimes did not stay in Taiwan but spread to Washington. The Taiwanese may clean up the mess he left but Americans probably do not have the patience to do so for long.
Some major issues certainly need to be discussed during next year's presidential election. Yet, some issues are "governance issues" which take tremendous time and effort to solve. Treating these issues with simplified and sensational campaign language and mindset will only result in a false choice of a false extreme. Evidence can be found in previous elections that employed national and ethnic identity as the campaign agenda.
Chen is likely to pursue the theological route in the upcoming election. All the people can do over the next few months is watch politicians fight each other over these highbrow issues and watch who will be the first to fall.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Jennie Shih
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS