The son of Guatemala's only Nobel Prize-winning novelist, Rodrigo Asturias, could easily have become a sedate man of letters like his father.
Instead, he chose the gun and ended up as one of Latin America's longest-serving guerrilla commanders in a bitter civil war that cost the lives of 200,000 people.
He has now put behind him more than 30 years of violence, exile and prohibition and is standing as a presidential candidate for the party born out of his former rebel movement in elections on Nov. 9.
Although he has no hope of winning, Asturias has converted himself into a full-fledged politician. He chain smokes US-made cigarettes at his party's offices in a large house in suburban Guatemala City.
But he has never fully emerged from the shadow of his late father, Miguel Angel Asturias.
Under an alias taken from one his father's novels, Asturias spent years fighting in the mountains and jungles of this verdant Central American nation, often sick and hungry.
That was not the life his father, who figured among the 20th century greats of Spanish-language literature and who died in 1974, had envisaged for him.
"I had lots of opportunities: I was with my father, I had an academic career, but my interests and convictions took me on another path," said Asturias.
Asturias had studied law in Buenos Aires and travelled abroad with his father as his secretary. He looked set for a privileged life as a diplomat or lawyer.
But in his early 20s he joined an armed uprising against Guatemala's US-backed military rulers in 1962 and later went on to lead the country's leftist rebel movement.
"It was the only way we had, the path of the armed struggle. All other doors had been closed," said Asturias, a mild-mannered 63-year-old.
Although his father moved abroad after divorcing his mother when Asturias was seven, the former rebel says he inherited a social conscience from the novelist.
The writer's 1946 novel El Senor Presidente [Mr President] is a condemnation of a Guatemalan dictator who ruled at the turn of the last century.
Asturias' nom-de-guerre was Gaspar Ilom after an Indian peasant hero in his father's 1949 book Hombres de Maiz [Men of Maize] which tells of the struggles of poor Mayan Indians.
To let his father know he was well, Asturias once sent a message from the field on a small piece of paper which was then rolled up, stuffed into a cigarette emptied of its tobacco and smuggled via Mexico to the novelist in exile in Spain.
It read simply: "The Men of Maize have turned into fighters," and was signed Gaspar Ilom.
"I knew he was very worried about me, as were the parents of hundreds of combatants, and being far away, they didn't understand our way of seeing things, what we believed in," Asturias said.
The fictional Gaspar Ilom was based on a real Indian peasant of the same name so by taking that alias Asturias ensured that fiction rooted in truth became fact once again, in a blurred reality typical of Latin American fiction.
Miguel Angel Asturias won the 1967 Nobel Prize for Literature and was hailed in the citation as an "an ardent foe of tyranny, slavery, injustice."
Mexican writer Carlos Fuentes and Peru's Mario Vargas Llosa both hold up his sometimes baroque and lyrical style as an influence on their work.
The guerrilla leader himself wrote 27 publications mostly on politics that were published clandestinely.
Asturias rose through the guerrilla ranks to become the founder of the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unit, or URNG, rebel group which brought together the country's four different guerrilla factions in the early 1980s.
Their supplies cut by an army "scorched-earth" campaign, the guerrillas failed to emulate Nicaragua's Sandinista rebels and take power. Troops killed thousands of Mayan Indian villagers to prevent them from aiding Guatemala's rebels.
Asturias fled the countryside to a series of safe houses in Guatemala City and across the border in Mexico.
After a 1996 peace treaty, Asturias hoped to become a mainstream politician with URNG as a political party, but his public image suffered badly when a rebel faction kidnapped an 86-year-old millionairess during the last stage of peace talks.
"Rodrigo Asturias had a very clear political vision but his great sin was the kidnapping, which damaged him politically," said Helen Mack, Guatemala's leading human rights campaigner.
Asturias is seen as having almost no chance of winning the elections but has no regrets about taking the path of peace.
"The war finished but the struggle continues. We were able to end the war with talks that opened the way for a transformation of society and the country through the agenda of peace," he said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the