On May 13, the US, Argentina, Canada and Egypt and nine other countries announced a request for WTO consultations with the EU over its moratorium on approving agricultural biotechnology products. The overwhelming preponderance of legal and scientific evidence supports their decision to challenge the EU over its stance on agricultural biotechnology.
Over the past five years, the EU has consistently violated the WTO's rules that require measures regulating imports to be based on sufficient scientific evidence and for regulatory approval procedures to be operated without undue delay. EU mem-bers have blocked regulatory approval of new agricultural biotechnology products since 1998 and have done so without presenting any scientific evidence demonstrating a danger to human health as required under the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement.
Simply put, the EU moratorium has no scientific basis. Bioengineered foods on the market have been shown to be as safe as conventional varieties. As noted by the French Academy of Sciences, more than 300 million Americans have been eating bioengineered corn and soybeans for years with no adverse consequences reported. The EU itself acknowledges that biotech foods on the market pose no threat to human health.
Unfortunately, the EU moratorium on agricultural biotechnology approvals has ramifications far beyond Europe. The EU's refusal to meet its WTO obligations is slowing down the adoption of a beneficial technology, and developing countries have already suffered negative consequences.
Last fall, some famine-stricken southern African countries balked at US food aid because of ill-informed health and environmental concerns, as well as fears that the countries' exports to Europe would be jeopardized by "contamination" of local crops. The introduction of vitamin-enhanced "Golden Rice" could dramatically reduce the incidence of childhood blindness in Asia. Those who stand to benefit the most from agricultural biotechnology do not have time on their side.
The spillover effects of the EU moratorium threaten to negate the benefits of biotechnology, which can help stimulate agricultural productivity and raise living standards. Farmers worldwide have recognized the economic, agricultural and environmental benefits of biotech crops. Biotech crops could help Taiwan's farmers compete more effectively in world markets.
Up to 80 percent of some crops in Africa are presently lost to drought. Biotech drought-resistant crops can help produce food in developing countries struggling to feed their populations while raising rural incomes.
Increased use of agricultural biotechnology can also yield substantial environmental benefits. Farmers utilizing biotech crops can reduce soil erosion and pesticide use. Biotech crops create more hospitable environments for wildlife, including streams and rivers spared from chemical pesticides. Farmers who are able to increase crop yields on existing land will be less tempted to encroach upon tropical rainforests and other fragile natural habitats.
At the same time, biotechnology can create high-paying jobs and stimulate economic development. It could revolutionize the way we live as much, or even more, than computer technology.
Finally, those who claim that the US is trying to force biotech foods on consumers have actually got the argument backwards. It is the EU's unilateral, illegal and unjustified actions which constrain choice and opportunity worldwide. The US and others seek regulations that maximize consumer choice while at the same time protecting consumer health and safety. We hope that the people of Taiwan will support the US as we move in the WTO to protect this life saving and growth enhancing technology.
Douglas Paal is director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS