In the 2000 presidential election, James Soong (
He cited the political situation in South Korea, saying that he intended to stay away from the "ever-changing mood of party competition and cooperation." He believed that both competition and cooperation between parties was nothing more than a game of power distribution. He took a bold attempt to walk on a "supra-partisan" path. He did not choose an "inter-party" alliance.
Soong at that time abandoned the KMT like a pair of worn-out shoes. Because he had no support from his party, he contrived the "supra-partisan" idea as a weapon against the KMT and the DPP. He even claimed that his approach was the true "mainstream of the new century."
Later, Soong formed the PFP, hoping to count on the 4.6 million votes that he had won in order to defeat the KMT in the legislative election at the end of the same year and his "supra-partisan" idea in so doing vanished before our eyes.
As the 2004 presidential election approaches, Soong's prestige wanes, particularly due to the presence of a "natural enemy" like Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). So he has no choice but to turn back and seek cooperation with Lien. He has ditched his "anti-alliance" position.
The most absurd aspect of all this is that the slogan "mainstream of the new century" upon which Soong was so keen to lavish time and attention three years ago, has unexpectedly been revived to describe the old strategy of "inter-party alliance" that he used to denounce, making a mockery of him because he used to talk so glibly about "the third way." Just like the "supra-partisan" idea, the notion of a "high-quality political party" promises to baffle us.
Thanks to people like Soong, the most terrible thing about party politics in this country is that politicians often go to two extremes. On the one hand, they act despicably in every possible way, towards people they consider to be of no use to them. On the other hand, they heap adoration, in every possible way, on people they consider to be of use to them.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Grace Shaw
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS