In the 2000 presidential election, James Soong (
He cited the political situation in South Korea, saying that he intended to stay away from the "ever-changing mood of party competition and cooperation." He believed that both competition and cooperation between parties was nothing more than a game of power distribution. He took a bold attempt to walk on a "supra-partisan" path. He did not choose an "inter-party" alliance.
Soong at that time abandoned the KMT like a pair of worn-out shoes. Because he had no support from his party, he contrived the "supra-partisan" idea as a weapon against the KMT and the DPP. He even claimed that his approach was the true "mainstream of the new century."
Later, Soong formed the PFP, hoping to count on the 4.6 million votes that he had won in order to defeat the KMT in the legislative election at the end of the same year and his "supra-partisan" idea in so doing vanished before our eyes.
As the 2004 presidential election approaches, Soong's prestige wanes, particularly due to the presence of a "natural enemy" like Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). So he has no choice but to turn back and seek cooperation with Lien. He has ditched his "anti-alliance" position.
The most absurd aspect of all this is that the slogan "mainstream of the new century" upon which Soong was so keen to lavish time and attention three years ago, has unexpectedly been revived to describe the old strategy of "inter-party alliance" that he used to denounce, making a mockery of him because he used to talk so glibly about "the third way." Just like the "supra-partisan" idea, the notion of a "high-quality political party" promises to baffle us.
Thanks to people like Soong, the most terrible thing about party politics in this country is that politicians often go to two extremes. On the one hand, they act despicably in every possible way, towards people they consider to be of no use to them. On the other hand, they heap adoration, in every possible way, on people they consider to be of use to them.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Grace Shaw
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS