Free speech covers ads
DPP Legislator Lai Chin-lin (賴勁麟) accused a monthly magazine of "taking advantage of freedom of speech while trying to promote sexual services through advertisements [for massage] like these" ("DPP legislator denounces `massage' advertisements," Feb. 21, page 2.) The article goes on to state that the Taipei City Government ordered the magazine to stop printing such advertisements or face fines of up to NT$600,000.
Evidently, neither Lai or the Taipei City Government has any idea of what freedom of speech means. It doesn't mean "You have a legal right to say or print anything you want to ... as long as you agree with me." That's Orwellian double speak. And it's a principle more in keeping with the government in China.
Freedom of speech necessarily implies that much of what gets said or printed is going to upset someone.
Of course, the speech in question here is naturally upsetting to many people. Most good citizens disapprove of prostitution and are repelled to see thinly veiled advertisements for it in print. But hard cases make bad law. The proper course here is not to ban the advertisements but to seek legal and social means to combat prostitution at the appropriate levels.
The authorities should prosecute anyone holding or selling women against their will to the full extent of the law. Where women are engaged as free agents the proper response should be social -- NGOs can offer education on STDs, vocational training, counseling, and shelter if need be.
What the government should not do is intervene in the right of individuals, newspapers, and magazines to print whatever they choose. That's a serious breech of civil liberties and the right of grown adults to make informed choices on their own.
Jeff Conolly
Taipei
Act now to save the parks
Every time I go to Hohuang-shan, I feel that something must be done as soon as possible to protect this heritage site. Gar-bage is accumulating everywhere, yet everyone seems happy with the situation. Most of people just go by car to the designated spots, get out and look at the scenery for 10 minutes, take a photo, then climb back into the car and continue their tour.
Our politicians usually do the same. But because their visits are announced ahead of time, the people in charge may carryout a scenery face-lift so politicians are left even more misguided.
To make matters worse, while walking in the forest behind the Guanying hostel, I almost got caught in a bait trap. This trap was less than 100m from a place where people are supposed to go to rest and perhaps decide to go for a walk in the nearby woods. The truth for Taiwan's national parks appears to be "do not go off the paved road or anything that happens to you will be your responsibility."
Every time I go to Hohuang-shan, there is more park construction which -- due to their location -- must cost a great deal of money. These facilities are supposed to attract tourists and serve them. Well, the best service and attraction begins with the essentials, that is, keeping the environment as wild and pristine as possible.
If the national parks (Shuei-pa and Wuling farm are almost the same) cannot cope with the amount of garbage and damage produced by the relatively few tourists they get now, how dare they think of trying to attract more people to these areas?
We are killing Taiwan's wilderness, step by step. Making it easy for tourists to go to remote areas without appropriated management and maintenance is an ecological nonsense equal to eco-suicide.
I hope government officials will one day get out of their cars and walk along the central cross-island highway, alone and unescorted (there's no security danger, except for the trucks and buses going up and down the narrow, winding road). While walking they should try to enter into a dialogue with nature, then look at all the different kinds of garbage along the side of the road, the slopes cleared for farming, the buses and trucks. If they do not realize then that there is a problem ... well perhaps, maybe they are the problem.
Francisco Carin Garcia
Taishan, Taipei County
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS