South Korea's new president was sworn in yesterday and to mark the occasion, North Korea test-fired a missile into the Sea of Japan. The missile test immediately ratcheted up tensions in Northeast Asia. Political tensions also heightened locally yesterday, as the Legislative Yuan opened its new session and the pan-blue and pan-green camps were quick to launch a few verbal missiles of their own.
According to Premier Yu Shyi-kun's report to the legislature, the nation's economic growth rate is 3.2 percent -- an indication that the economy is gradually recovering. Yet some members of the media and many politicians have ignored the government's efforts and news of an economic recovery. They continue to herald the nation's demise. Such behavior is both irresponsible and immoral.
Confrontation between the ruling and opposition parties is inevitable. However, given the recent KMT-PFP campaign alliance, the opposition will control a majority in this session. So it is highly likely that the legislature will be locked in neutral this session since the opposition is determined to make the government look as though it has achieved nothing in the run-up to next year's presidential election.
The logjams and ludicrous grandstanding seen in the last session and in previous years are bound to look like child's play compared to what could happen this session.
For example, the opposition parties abused their majority to block almost all of the Executive Yuan's proposals in the Procedure Committee last session, thereby denying DPP legislators the opportunity to debate the bills on the floor. The DPP's proposed constitutional and government reforms included downsizing of the government, accelerating the privatization of state-owned industries, overhauling the legislature and a new electoral system featuring smaller constituencies and two votes.
Paralyzing the legislative procedure in this manner highlights the violence perpetrated by the opposition on virtue of its majority. Such partisan politicking serves no one but those running the opposition parties -- not the legislature, not the nation and not the people. The KMT and the PFP have been behaving almost like they are opposing the government on behalf of Beijing. Such antics have caused many people to lose faith in the nation's future.
North Korea's missile test was aimed at showing off its power. Pyongyang's rulers don't care if their people have no food to eat. Such a mentality is a specialty of authoritarian regimes. The existence of the North Korean regime relies on political power that suppresses its people.
This nation's opposition parties exhibit a similar mentality. In order to gain political power, they use their legislative majority to suppress the political reforms so desired by the people so as to stifle the people's power. Aren't they paving the way for the return of an authoritarian regime?
Because many people believe this legislative session will see explosive exchanges and farces, many families have already decided to bar their children from watching TV news programs so they won't be exposed to such antics.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS