Take defense seriously
Having read Tony Wilkinson's letter (Letters, Feb. 19, page 8), I'm still wondering what his point is. Surely it's not that William Cohen, chairman of the US-Taiwan Business Council, has changed his tune. People, even government ministers, do that all the time. Why should Cohen be any different from the chickenhawks leading the George W. Bush administration?
Speaking of the Bush-leaguers, they are not the first government to make messengers out of former officials. One must admit they are useful mouthpieces when the message is tough and sitting secretaries of governments departments aren't permitted to talk offi-cially. Does Wilkinson object that Cohen isn't flogging top-of-the-line equipment?
Taiwan has defended itself quite capably for the past half century with semi-obsolete US equipment. More importantly, key components of Taiwan's war machine -- the Sidewinder missiles used in the Taiwan Strait crisis of 1958, the Patriot missiles now defending Taipei and the 150 F-16s sold by then president George Bush -- were not obsolete. They were cutting- edge.
President George W. Bush has said that his administration would "do whatever necessary to defend Taiwan" so the commitment is still there. It's up to Taiwan to pick up the ball and run with it.
Recently, however, Taiwan has shown no inclination to defend itself. The armed forces are demoralized and shrinking; the business community demands increased trade with the enemy; undermanned units sit in barracks while young "men" flee overseas in droves and the Legislative Yuan can't bring itself to buy the only advanced weapons available -- those "cast off" by the US.
Those in the US who want to sell Taiwan the means to defend itself have to wonder, why send this country "Star Wars" technology if it and the secrets it holds are going to end up in the hands of China?
Bruce Franklin
Taipei
Other side not greener
After spending the Lunar New Year holiday in Taiwan, I was surprised to return to Beijing to find a exhaustive list of Web sites blocked -- many sites from those publishing news-oriented information to others of a more academic nature had suddenly without explanation been made unavailable to the public. So much for the liberating effects of WTO membership.
However, during my visit to Taiwan I experienced something even more shocking -- my pan-blue camp friends attitudes towards China's media. They appear to have some mistaken notion that the communists are actually allowing information to flow freely to the people. While staying in Taipei, more than a few people told me that they had read about the growing freedoms of China's press and the increasing number of Chinese people surfing the Internet.
Well certainly, more and more people are getting online and enjoying the freedom of buying whatever products they want -- as long as these products do not contain any content encouraging free thought or expression. Consider some poor shmuck in Guangzhou who published his opinions of President Jiang Zemin (
Nevermind the soulless labors of most of the China's press. To be as bland as possible is the ultimate goal of every editor who appreciates their job. No, in most cases anyway, they will not face prison or work camps, but no one in today's China relishes the thought of being unemployed and unemployable.
So maybe all those -- look at China's growing intellectual freedoms -- pan-blue types should give their heads a shake and take another look. Of course in Taiwan people are free to spout whatever misinformation and nonsense they want -- they live in a free country.
Rosanne Cerello
Beijing
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS