Why is the government stalling over the case of Xu Bo (
We have heard a number of different reasons why a decision on Xu's case has taken so long. First we were told that, since he was traveling on a false passport, there was a question of identity. That question having been resolved, we were then told that there was nevertheless doubt as to whether Xu was a genuine escapee from political persecution. Xiang Lin (
After his 30,000-character book on the Tiananmen crisis, Red Fascist, irked Beijing's red fascists, Xu fled China's security state in 1999 and sought refuge in South Korea. There he was granted refugee status by the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), which asked the South Korean government not to deport him. But he also received less-than-welcome attention from Seoul's National Intelligence Service which labeled him "an anti-establishment activist" and sought his deportation, irrespective of UNHCR's request. Fearing that it was just a matter of time before the South Koreans sent him back to China, Xu hopped on a plane to Thailand that stopped over in Taipei, and asked for asylum here.
Xu's problem, the government now says, is that this country has no asylum law -- you can't claim asylum because the nation doesn't recognize the concept. This seems strange when one considers that the ROC is itself an exile from China. It seems downright reprehensible when one considers how many leading lights of the DPP have themselves spent time in political exile. When the DPP came to power it promised an emphasis on human rights and a shakeup of the legal system according to that agenda. This has yet to come.
This is the second time in less than six months that Taiwan's lip-service-only attitude to human rights has been on display. Last October Tang Yuanjun (
It is interesting to note the silence of the pan-blue camp on the fate of these dissidents. The only politicians who have shown any concern are from the TSU. There was a a time when the pan-blue camp would welcome "anti-communist heroes." Now it is conspiring with China in the destruction of this nation's democracy, it isn't interested.
But the real source of disgust over this country's attitude to both Xu and Tang comes from the suspicion that the reluctance to take them in comes from a desire to appease China. If so then this attitude can only be roundly condemned. It is deplorable if this nation is prepared to trade human-rights principles for a cozier relationship with the dictators next door. Let's be honest: the democratization of China, the replacement of the vicious clique that tyrannizes that luckless foreign land by a democracy is, along with the US Seventh Fleet, probably Taiwan's only long- term hope. There is a natural unity of interest between the dissidents and this country. That the government cannot find a place for them here is a scandal.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS