Identity awareness is crucial
The passport proposal has had a long enough gestation period. An executive decree stating the fact that the Republic of China passport is issued in Taiwan should have been already executed a year ago. As a sovereign entity, the de facto and de jure (take it to court!) ROC must act on its own with dignity and self-confidence and treat itself with respect.
There is but a year left in which to truly establish the Taiwan identity, be it a republic or a province. Election cycles will be in full force on both sides of the ironically named Pacific. This could mean that the cross-strait affair escalates into a brief, but terminal military checkmate in the midst of the oscillation between diplomatic and psychological posturing in this era of the war on terrorism. Preconditions for "negotiations" will be unnecessary at that point.
China's proposed SAR/"two systems" demotion provides no panacea economically and is entirely unworkable both politically and legally. At that point, irony may grant a less-proud version of the "two systems" changes and a generation's efforts may be reduced to a footnote in world history.
May Taiwanese quickly find themselves in front of a mirror, and with as much posture as their self-respect will allow, ask themselves: "What is my nationality?" It may be the last dignified chance for the Taiwan people to decide for themselves.
Chris Frost
New York
Why not `Taiwan Airways'?
It's about time the Taiwanese government and people are addressing the problem of the word "Taiwan" not appearing on Taiwanese passports. As an importer of many Taiwan-made products and as a frequent visitor to your country for over 30 years, I've had to cope with the North American consumer perception that the ROC is the PRC. Whenever the word "China" appears anywhere it's assumed to refer to mainland China. For years I had to ask my suppliers to omit "ROC" from all packaging material, including shipping containers, and simply show "Made In Taiwan."
But I think this is not enough. Taiwan should consider extending this practice in other areas. For example your national airline, China Airlines (CAL). Again, most of the world perceives this to be from the mainland. Why not consider a new name that is easily recognizable? I may even suggest a name, "Taiwan Airways" (TAW or TAIW). It has a nice ring to it. Surely no one could have any reasonable objection to such a change. The list of such possible changes is long and not necessary to mention here. I'm sure you understand my point.
Phil Rossi
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS