To demonstrate their determination to curb crime and eradicate "black gold," Minister of Interior Yu Cheng-hsien (
It is interesting just how very specific these targets were. Yu proposed to accomplish "zero growth in the crime rate" within three months; Chen proposed to prosecute at least 50 corruption cases, conduct 10,000 searches and prosecute 1,000 drug-use cases within three months. If these goals are not reached, both vowed to make themselves accountable and resign.
This brings to memory Lin Yang-kang's (林洋港) boasting during his term as minister of the interior. He promised he would bring an end to the metal cages people put on their windows for safety. His statement made him the laughing stock of the nation.
The crime rate consistently has been a key issue for Taiwanese voters. Therefore, public pressure is elevated when it comes to crime control.
Is there a crime problem in Taiwan? The answer differs, depending on whether crime statistics or public perception are used as the criteria. Sometimes statistics released by the government are very impressive, but the public may still feel uneasy. To the government, rating the crime problem is based on the fluctuation of objective statistics. To the people, it is based on a subjective sense of security that is influenced by the crime stories they see in the media.
When Chen Chin-hsing (陳進興) was a fugitive, he committed crimes at will and wherever he pleased, creating a great sense of helplessness. Although the government tried to prove -- based on statistics -- that there was no worsening of crime problem, Lien Chan (連戰) still had to resign as premier due to public pressure.
Here are a things Yu and Chen may wish to consider:
First, crime-fighting requires good management skills, rather than hot-headedness that can lead to taking action blindly. It needs to be done regularly and systematically. It is not a three-month endeavor, but a measured application of pressure. Obviously, crime can never be completely eradicated, but it can be controlled to a certain degree.
Second, statistics can be deceiving. It is the duty of law-enforcement agencies to fight crime. But setting specific arrest targets and having three-month crackdowns can only push them to deliberately stall ongoing investigations until it is time to show progress. To meet targets, they can just decrease the number of cases they cover up.
Third, crime control should not be used as an election-year vote-getter. After all, it would make policy implementation unnecessarily complicated for police on the streets. Once the opposition parties join the circus, then another boxing match between the opposition and the ruling camp ensues.
If the crime rate of Taiwan can be curbed within a short period time, that would be good. But the focus of crime-fighting should still be strategies and procedure implementation. The Cabinet need not take credit for dips in the crime rate, because the fight against crime is a never-ending war, rather than a short-term crackdown. As long as serious and long-term efforts are made, the people will naturally begin to sense gradual improvement.
Finally, recall that relying on law enforcement to fight crimes is only dealing with the symptoms. To heal the illness, improvements in people's lives and education level are still the best way to long-term health.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS