More than 30 opposition lawmakers have endorsed a bill to amend the qualification requirements for the president and vice president of the Judicial Yuan. The move is a clear indication that no one is ready to give up trying to mix politics with justice and the law. Unfortunately, this habit is extremely hazardous to the progress of judicial reform.
According to the opposition bill, the top two officials in the Judicial Yuan could not be older than 65 years of age and must have sat on the Council of Grand Justices for at least three years. Taken at face value, neither condition would appear to be unreasonable. However, it just so happens that such requirements, if enacted, would disqualify two of the three top candidates for these offices.
Judicial Yuan President Weng Yueh-sheng (翁岳生) is 71. He was one of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) law professors and has a very close personal relationship with Chen. Grand Justice Lai In-jaw's (
Passage of the bill would virtually guarantee the third candidate -- Judicial Yuan Vice President Cheng Chung-Mo (
Word on the street has it that Cheng hasn't been on good terms with Weng. Conspiracy theorists are also making much of the fact that the KMT lawmaker who spearheaded the bill reportedly sought a job in the Judicial Yuan in the past -- unsuccessfully, of course.
There is another bill to amend the Organic Law of the Judicial Yuan that has been languishing before the Legislative Yuan for quite a while. This bill was submitted by the Judicial Yuan and based entirely on the conclusions reached by the National Judicial Reform Conference in 1999 -- a conference spearheaded by the then KMT government. This bill does not have an age limit or minimum Council of Grand Justices tenure requirement. It is ironic that KMT lawmakers have now submitted a bill that contradicts the result of the 1999 conference their party pushed for. The move appears to be another case of opposing a the DPP government just for the sake of stirring up trouble.
In addition, such strict requirements for the judiciary's top jobs is almost unheard of. The proposed age cap is a joke. In fact, in more advanced countries, this might be seen as a case of age discrimination. There is no age cap for the nation's president or vice president or for heads of the four other branches of government. If an identical age cap were imposed on the presidency and vice presidency, neither KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
At a time when the pan-blue camp is being jeered for practicing "old men politics," it is truly touching to see some of their own lawmakers standing up to prove people wrong by ensuring that younger folks will get a crack at at least one top job.
Nevertheless, passage of the bill would impose restrictions on the right of the president to make appointments.
It also would taint the nation's top judicial jobs with a political stain that would be hard to erase. The bill should not be passed.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS