"We used to grow opium," says Asoupa, a Lisu farmer in northwest Thailand, "but now we only grow cabbages and corn and other crops. It's better. If we grow opium, we get in trouble and lose everything."
Asoupa represents the country's once-primary opium growers, the hill tribes of northwest Thailand -- the Lisu, Lahu, Akha, Mein and Hmong. Living in remote jungle villages, they practice slash-and-burn agriculture.
The Thai government, in cooperation with the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and UN International Drug Control Program (UNDCP), combined aggressive eradication and interdiction with flexible, alternative crop programs to encourage poverty-ridden hill tribes to abandon opium in favor of legal "cash crops" including cabbages, tomatoes, mung beans, peaches, strawberries, and Arabica coffee.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
Thailand's official ban on opium cultivation began in 1959. The early alternative crop programs were plagued with problems, from insects to fluctuating market prices. The hill tribes couldn't compete with lowland farmers who got significantly better yields, and the lack of roads into tribal areas made it difficult to get crops to market.
The combination of improved market access, viable alternative crops, and harsh penalties encouraged most hill tribe villages to abandon opium. The alternative crop program in Thailand has been so successful that the UN was able to curtail direct support since most village economies now revolve around legal crops and are no longer in need of assistance.
The current opium crop, harvested during December and January, marks the fourth successive year the opium harvest in Thailand was estimated to be less than 1,000 hectares. By comparison, opium cultivation in Myanmar has ranged from 80,000 to 170,000 hectares.
While Thailand was initiating its eradication programs, Myanmar continued to produce up to 2,500 tonnes of opium annually. Much of it was refined into number four grade heroin, about 90 percent pure. To stifle the flow of drugs out of Burma, the Thai government organized Task Force 399. Comprised of several hundred military personnel and border guards, and supported by an extensive intelligence network, Task Force 399 snares drug smugglers as they enter Thailand. In an effort to circumvent the task force, some smugglers are traveling from Burma to Laos before attempting to enter Thailand.
Aggressive operations by the Border Patrol Police, Royal Thai Army Third Region Command and Task Force 399 finally caused many drug smugglers to avoid the country altogether and seek alternative routes out of Myanmar.
"A lot of heroin is being shipped through China," says William Snipes, the DEA's regional director in Bangkok.
"Part of it is feeding a growing addict population in China, but much of it is shipped on to Western markets," he said.
The UNDCP estimates that 60 percent of Myanmar's opiate production is now shipped through China.
To monitor drug traffickers, the US and the Thai government established three separate intelligence gathering modules. Each center collects information on drug activity and trafficking for its respective geographic region. Information is combined and analyzed to respond to immediate opportunities, feed ongoing investigations and predict future activity.
On the operational side, the DEA has four specially trained units that target specific operations and geographic areas of interest on land and sea. Thailand has the death penalty for drug smugglers and authorizes the forfeiture of criminal proceeds through the seizure of bank accounts and other assets. The Thai government has been very cooperative in fulfilling extradition requests of drug dealers for criminal prosecution in other countries.
While Thai authorities have been successful in eradicating the indigenous opium crop and intercepting heroin shipments coming from Myanmar, they have been plagued by a growing problem with amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS), primarily methamphetamine. Methamphetamine pills, called yaba in Thailand, have been around for decades.
Approximately 800 million methamphetamine pills were smuggled into Thailand during the last year. Virtually all of the production takes place in Myanmar and is smuggled across the border into Thailand, with some shipments being routed through Laos. The Wa and the Shan tribes are the primary players in the meth trade, just as they have been in the opium and heroin trade.
Initially used by truck drivers and workers to stay awake and increase stamina, usage among young Thais began increasing around 1988 as they copied the habits of dancers, a few locals, and tourists in Patpong and other entertainment areas. Ten years later, methamphetamine abuse was rampant, driven by increased supplies and falling prices. Methamphetamine indictments in Thailand increased from 1,025 in 1988 to a staggering 125,335 by 1998. There were 187,479 cases during 2001.
Eventually, methamphetamine made its way into schools, cutting across social and economic boundaries and the government declared it the number one security and social threat. The rise of methamphetamine also caused a surge in the number of polydrug users, individuals abusing more than one drug.
The volume of ecstasy entering Thailand began to increase about 1998, but its manufacture in the Netherlands kept its price steep and supply limited, a deterrent to Thai youth. The club scene, however, including raves frequented by Western tourists, has fueled recent growth of this ATS.
The seizure of ecstasy imported from Europe has increased more than six-fold in the last four years. Ecstasy is now being manufactured in Southeast Asia, lowering the price and increasing availability.
A sign of the growing drug problem and expanded efforts by Thai authorities is the number of Thais in jail.
"The prison population in Thailand has doubled in the last five years," says Douglas Rasmussen of the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement (INL) at the US Embassy in Bangkok.
"Over 60 percent are for drug issues," Rasmussen said.
To combat the growing use of methamphetamines, Thai authorities, assisted by US government officials, significantly changed their approach to the drug trade. The Thai government broadened their scope from eradication and interdiction to demand reduction through education, prevention, and rehabilitation programs.
"The Thais are using a multifaceted approach to combat the drug trade," notes Rasmussen. "They realize you can't just go after the supply side, you have to go after the demand side too."
A number of agencies were established to provide training programs in drug counseling and drug prevention for school teachers and community outreach workers throughout Thailand. A joint effort by the DEA and Thai officials set up a successful DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program based on the US model.
"Approximately 130 Thai police officers conduct drug awareness classes in middle and high schools," says Snipes. "The Thais are very concerned about methamphetamine going down into the younger ages."
The government established community antidrug center throughout Thailand, including one in Klum Tay, a notorious Bangkok slum.
"We must educate the younger generation," says a Thai police official, "and this will carry on because they will educate their children."
Thai actors and musicians have become involved in the campaign.
The Ministry of Public Health dramatically increased the number of drug treatment centers, and today there are over 500, ranging from public and private hospitals to drug rehab clinics. Since methamphetamine treatment is different than heroin, and requires more family support, drug centers have modified and expanded their programs to address specific needs.
Since 1999, the majority of people seeking treatment in Thailand have been addicted to methamphetamines. As recently as 1995, heroin (90 percent) and opium (5 percent) addicts accounted for 95 percent of the treatment population.
To help fight drugs on a regional level, the International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) of Bangkok opened in 1999 under the direction of the US State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL). The curriculum covers everything from narcotics trafficking and money laundering to computer crime and illegal migration.
Courses are taught by the Thai police and the Office of Narcotics Control Board in conjunction with representatives of several US government agencies. Experts are brought in from around the world including the Netherlands, Australia and Taiwan.
Police and government officials from Thailand, Cambodia, China, Laos, Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei and the Philippines attend the academy.
"One of our objectives," says Luis Diaz-Rodriquez with INL, "is to build cooperation between branches of law enforcement, both within and between these countries. We hope to have alumni that will assist each other in investigations and exchange information between themselves and their US counterparts."
In addition to the ILEA, the UN Drug Control Office in Bangkok has developed a Regional Cooperation Program with Thailand, Cambodia, China, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam.
"The regional program complements a number of different country level projects," says Vincent McClean, formerly with the UNDCP Bangkok office.
"It also encourages cooperation between members by bringing them together for joint training and discussion," he said.
McClean is currently the director of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in New York.
The proliferation of new drugs like methamphetamine and ecstasy, combined with the devastating impact of heroin, cocaine and other narcotics, can best be controlled through interagency cooperation at the regional and global level.
At one time, many transit countries, that is countries through which drugs were transported on their way to more lucrative markets, didn't consider the drug trade to be a serious problem. That changed when the "bleed" effect -- drugs dealt along transit routes -- caused them to have a growing population of addicts and the secondary problems of crime, HIV and corruption of police officers and public officials.
Developing interagency operations like those run by the UN, DEA and INL facilitates regional cooperation. These programs provide education and incentive to discourage people from using drugs, help for those already addicted and a flexible, cooperative web of law enforcement and regulatory agencies that apprehend drug dealers and eliminate smuggling operations.
James Emery is an anthropologist and journalist who has covered the Asian drug trade for over 15 years.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS