When the DPP finally took over the reigns of government, no one ever foresaw that it would increase censorship.
The Government Information Office (GIO) has recently censored foreign films with a heavy-handedness not seen since the dark days of martial law. Despite all the rhetoric about freedom and openness, once in power the DPP has turned out to be very culturally conservative.
Last fall the GIO ruined the Golden Horse Awards film festival by banning public access to a number of foreign art films. One of the films the public could not see was Apocalypse Now Redux, the director's cut of a classic film based on Joseph Conrad's famous novel Heart of Darkness. Film critics universally consider it an important cinematic masterpiece. The New York Times called it "a great movie" that achieves "sublimity."
The GIO gave the film a very different review when they prohibited the public from attending the screenings. Apocalypse Now Redux was later shown on cable television, but originally only film students were allowed to see it for educational purposes.
That festival was just the start a new era of censorship. For example, the acclaimed Mexican film Y Tu Mama Tambien was recently shown in Taipei, but with dancing dots covering up the nudity. The GIO seems to consider it pornographic and harmful. More reliable film critics have a very different opinion. The San Francisco Examiner called the film "an absolute must-see." The BBC proclaimed it "a great film." And the New York Times said "the audience will have seen something unforgettable."
Earlier I wrote a letter to GIO Director General Arthur Iap (
Anyone who thinks that Taiwan is free will be disappointed to learn that the government is theoretically required by law to ban films for a disturbingly large number of reasons. If the censorship laws were enforced to the letter, almost every film would be prohibited. Media freedom in this country is not based on rights enshrined in legislation, but merely on the uncertain altruism of the government bureaucrats.
The recent rise of censorship points to a strange contradiction within the DPP. As an opposition party they portrayed themselves as partisans of liberty. But to succeed in elections, they must appeal to their core constituency of extremely conservative voters in the south. Even though very few rural voters watch foreign art films, the prejudices of southern conservatives now dictate what Taipei audiences can see.
As the country gets to know the DPP better, we are beginning to see how the party's ranks unfortunately include unsophisticated people who have little understanding of the world beyond this little island. The painful indecision that often grips the DPP reflects a culture clash between the provincial society of southern Taiwan and the diversity of the modern globalized world.
DPP censorship of foreign art films shows the party recoiling from foreign ideas that many of its members neither understand nor like. If this continues, it will be interesting to see how the rest of the world reacts. Officially the international community considers the government illegitimate. And yet this country continues to attract enthusiastic international support for one reason -- because the government supposedly embraces freedom.
Commitment to the humane ideals of liberty, human rights, and tolerance are the nation's sole source of legitimacy in the eyes of the world. Censoring foreign films undermines its only means of attracting international support.
Bret Hinsch is an associate professor at the department of history at National Chung Cheng University.
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot
RSS