Taiwan's model role
The article ("Chen calls on China to restart stalled dialogue," Nov. 11, page 1) could not help make me think that President Chen Shui-bian's (
Your editorial page backed up that assertion saying, "In May, Chen came up with a solution to opening direct links without having direct negotiations between Beijing and Taipei."
But now that China has called Chen's bluff by agreeing in principle to his formula for such relations, he is backpedaling and wrapping himself in the flag -- although it is not clear what flag anymore.
Granted, it is better to backpedal in defense of the country than to maintain a foolish consistency, but now Chen's talk of a desire to normalize relations with the PRC has proven hollow.
From the beginning, in word and deed, Chen has proven that he has no desire to incite a conflict. Taiwan's allies and enemies alike have no reason to doubt his competency.
Insofar as his "middle way" has exhausted its utility, Chen can now take a more aggressive line with China. Aside from China's belligerence toward Taiwanese sovereignty, the biggest issue has arguably been the question of direct links.
There are not many advantages Taiwan has in its confrontation with China. One of the few is the moral highground Taiwan has in the eyes of the world. Taiwan cannot afford to give China more opportunities to appear reasonable and non-ideological.
In being more aggressive with China, Chen does not have to call for referendums or talk about the sovereignty of the ROC (especially since the ROC cannot be said to have any sovereignty, except insofar as it serves as a mechanism through which the people of Taiwan express their sovereign wills).
It only means that he has to be frank and direct. He must be honest with the people of Taiwan and with the rest of the world by stressing at least two facts -- that the question of Taiwan's right to self-determination is not an isolated one, nor is it likely to be resolved quickly or easily and that there can be no free Asia without a free China.
The liberal powers of Asia cannot afford to be passive about China's progress toward pluralist democracy. Nor can they afford to rely almost ex-clusively on US activism to fend off Chinese aggression. Liberal values are only now beginning to bud in Asia. But if they are to survive, they have to guard not only against reactionaries at home, but tyrants abroad, as well.
The people of Taiwan have been thrust into an enormously difficult situation, forced into an undesired confrontation with China, simply be-cause they wish to determine their own destiny. They cannot afford not to talk about the creation of a liberal Asia and, consequently, the eventual liberation of China.
Taiwan's hopes of exercising its right to self-determination cannot be won alone. The support Taiwan now receives from abroad is not in defense of ROC sovereignty; it is in support of Taiwan's emerging democracy and its right to self-determination.
Taiwan must make it clear that the future of Taiwan is the future of Asia. If Taiwan is allowed to fall to the barbarism of the "Great China" ideology, it will be a huge disaster for freedom in Asia.
In short, Taiwan's freedom is bound to the freedom of Asia. Or, rather, Asia's freedom is bound to the freedom of Taiwan.
Taiwan's peculiar situation necessitates that its political leaders actively claim the vanguard of Asian liberalism. It is time for the Taiwanese to forge their own destiny, to make their voices heard in Asia and across the globe.
Nobody else can do it for them.
J. Tavis Overstreet
Chiayi
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS