Taiwan's model role
The article ("Chen calls on China to restart stalled dialogue," Nov. 11, page 1) could not help make me think that President Chen Shui-bian's (
Your editorial page backed up that assertion saying, "In May, Chen came up with a solution to opening direct links without having direct negotiations between Beijing and Taipei."
But now that China has called Chen's bluff by agreeing in principle to his formula for such relations, he is backpedaling and wrapping himself in the flag -- although it is not clear what flag anymore.
Granted, it is better to backpedal in defense of the country than to maintain a foolish consistency, but now Chen's talk of a desire to normalize relations with the PRC has proven hollow.
From the beginning, in word and deed, Chen has proven that he has no desire to incite a conflict. Taiwan's allies and enemies alike have no reason to doubt his competency.
Insofar as his "middle way" has exhausted its utility, Chen can now take a more aggressive line with China. Aside from China's belligerence toward Taiwanese sovereignty, the biggest issue has arguably been the question of direct links.
There are not many advantages Taiwan has in its confrontation with China. One of the few is the moral highground Taiwan has in the eyes of the world. Taiwan cannot afford to give China more opportunities to appear reasonable and non-ideological.
In being more aggressive with China, Chen does not have to call for referendums or talk about the sovereignty of the ROC (especially since the ROC cannot be said to have any sovereignty, except insofar as it serves as a mechanism through which the people of Taiwan express their sovereign wills).
It only means that he has to be frank and direct. He must be honest with the people of Taiwan and with the rest of the world by stressing at least two facts -- that the question of Taiwan's right to self-determination is not an isolated one, nor is it likely to be resolved quickly or easily and that there can be no free Asia without a free China.
The liberal powers of Asia cannot afford to be passive about China's progress toward pluralist democracy. Nor can they afford to rely almost ex-clusively on US activism to fend off Chinese aggression. Liberal values are only now beginning to bud in Asia. But if they are to survive, they have to guard not only against reactionaries at home, but tyrants abroad, as well.
The people of Taiwan have been thrust into an enormously difficult situation, forced into an undesired confrontation with China, simply be-cause they wish to determine their own destiny. They cannot afford not to talk about the creation of a liberal Asia and, consequently, the eventual liberation of China.
Taiwan's hopes of exercising its right to self-determination cannot be won alone. The support Taiwan now receives from abroad is not in defense of ROC sovereignty; it is in support of Taiwan's emerging democracy and its right to self-determination.
Taiwan must make it clear that the future of Taiwan is the future of Asia. If Taiwan is allowed to fall to the barbarism of the "Great China" ideology, it will be a huge disaster for freedom in Asia.
In short, Taiwan's freedom is bound to the freedom of Asia. Or, rather, Asia's freedom is bound to the freedom of Taiwan.
Taiwan's peculiar situation necessitates that its political leaders actively claim the vanguard of Asian liberalism. It is time for the Taiwanese to forge their own destiny, to make their voices heard in Asia and across the globe.
Nobody else can do it for them.
J. Tavis Overstreet
Chiayi
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS