There was good news for local governments and bad news for taxpayers on Tuesday as the Legislative Yuan enacted a law authorizing local governments to collect local taxes. This is in essence a tax increase, since local governments will now be able to levy taxes on a wide variety of things, ranging from creating noise pollution and owning pets to tourism and street vendors.
It is no surprise that the taxpayers have not rushed to embrace the new law. However, local governments are not exactly thrilled about it either. They fear the central government is leaving them with the role of the heavy while it gets credit for not raising national taxes.
Governments at every level are short of funds but the central government doesn't dare raise taxes ahead of key elections, including the 2004 presidential poll. It would be political suicide. The central government has tried everything to increase revenues without hiking taxes. The prime example is the thorough and widespread tax audits on income tax filings. Local governments are also looking for ways to increase revenues, as seen by Taipei's sudden enthusiasm for strictly enforcing traffic laws which has resulted in a record number of tickets being issued.
Under the new law, local councils or legislatures will have to approve the collection of new taxes. Given the political volatility of such a move, it is unlikely that many local governments will actually decide to levy new taxes in the foreseeable future. Some local governments had hoped that they would be able to levy taxes on those outside their jurisdiction -- such as the downstream water users of reservoirs -- which would eliminate the risk of a backlash from their own constituents. Unfortunately, the new law specifically bans such taxes. Local governments are prohibited from collecting taxes for trade and natural resources or mineral products outside their borders, as well as cross-district government enterprises.
No wonder Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Hsinchu County Commissioner Cheng Yung-chin (
The new law brings neither money nor gratitude for anyone. So why did the central government even bother to enact it?
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
RSS