There was good news for local governments and bad news for taxpayers on Tuesday as the Legislative Yuan enacted a law authorizing local governments to collect local taxes. This is in essence a tax increase, since local governments will now be able to levy taxes on a wide variety of things, ranging from creating noise pollution and owning pets to tourism and street vendors.
It is no surprise that the taxpayers have not rushed to embrace the new law. However, local governments are not exactly thrilled about it either. They fear the central government is leaving them with the role of the heavy while it gets credit for not raising national taxes.
Governments at every level are short of funds but the central government doesn't dare raise taxes ahead of key elections, including the 2004 presidential poll. It would be political suicide. The central government has tried everything to increase revenues without hiking taxes. The prime example is the thorough and widespread tax audits on income tax filings. Local governments are also looking for ways to increase revenues, as seen by Taipei's sudden enthusiasm for strictly enforcing traffic laws which has resulted in a record number of tickets being issued.
Under the new law, local councils or legislatures will have to approve the collection of new taxes. Given the political volatility of such a move, it is unlikely that many local governments will actually decide to levy new taxes in the foreseeable future. Some local governments had hoped that they would be able to levy taxes on those outside their jurisdiction -- such as the downstream water users of reservoirs -- which would eliminate the risk of a backlash from their own constituents. Unfortunately, the new law specifically bans such taxes. Local governments are prohibited from collecting taxes for trade and natural resources or mineral products outside their borders, as well as cross-district government enterprises.
No wonder Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Hsinchu County Commissioner Cheng Yung-chin (
The new law brings neither money nor gratitude for anyone. So why did the central government even bother to enact it?
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS