There was good news for local governments and bad news for taxpayers on Tuesday as the Legislative Yuan enacted a law authorizing local governments to collect local taxes. This is in essence a tax increase, since local governments will now be able to levy taxes on a wide variety of things, ranging from creating noise pollution and owning pets to tourism and street vendors.
It is no surprise that the taxpayers have not rushed to embrace the new law. However, local governments are not exactly thrilled about it either. They fear the central government is leaving them with the role of the heavy while it gets credit for not raising national taxes.
Governments at every level are short of funds but the central government doesn't dare raise taxes ahead of key elections, including the 2004 presidential poll. It would be political suicide. The central government has tried everything to increase revenues without hiking taxes. The prime example is the thorough and widespread tax audits on income tax filings. Local governments are also looking for ways to increase revenues, as seen by Taipei's sudden enthusiasm for strictly enforcing traffic laws which has resulted in a record number of tickets being issued.
Under the new law, local councils or legislatures will have to approve the collection of new taxes. Given the political volatility of such a move, it is unlikely that many local governments will actually decide to levy new taxes in the foreseeable future. Some local governments had hoped that they would be able to levy taxes on those outside their jurisdiction -- such as the downstream water users of reservoirs -- which would eliminate the risk of a backlash from their own constituents. Unfortunately, the new law specifically bans such taxes. Local governments are prohibited from collecting taxes for trade and natural resources or mineral products outside their borders, as well as cross-district government enterprises.
No wonder Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Hsinchu County Commissioner Cheng Yung-chin (
The new law brings neither money nor gratitude for anyone. So why did the central government even bother to enact it?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS