The serious difficulties facing Taiwan's economy means that various individuals and organizations will voice dissatisfaction with government policies. This is inevitable in a democratic country.
Reports about a demonstration in Taipei by about 100,000 farmers and fishermen this Saturday should not worry society. Nor should the planned protests cause the government to weaken appropriate reforms of the credit departments of farmers' and fishermen's associations. Policy flip-flops will only confuse matters and cause people to lose faith in the government's reform measures.
To be fair, executives at the farmers' and fishermen's credit co-operatives are responsible for most of the financial difficulties facing the co-ops. These executives, in cooperation with opposition politicians, have fanned the flames of anger for the farmers and fishermen, whose livelihoods have long been facing difficulties. They have painted the government's plan to manage the failing co-ops as an attempt to "annihilate" them.
They have forced the government to make a major policy U-turn by suspending implementation of the reforms. This will allow the co-op executives, who have long preyed on ordinary rural citizens, to carry on with their financial misdeeds. The consequences of this will be endless and farmers and fishermen will find it even more difficult to improve their livelihoods.
The farmers' and fishermen's associations have long been controlled by the KMT and have long since evolved into political platforms for local gangsters. In every election, the KMT has engaged in vote-buying through these organizations.
In addition, local factions have often treated the credit co-ops like their own personal coffers. Illegal and non-performing loans have been serious and prevalent problems at the co-ops. Many of them are facing collapse due to widespread embezzlement.
In short, the credit co-ops are a time bomb waiting to blow up Taiwan's financial sector. There can be absolutely no excuse for the government to avoid reforming these corrupt institutions.
Former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) idea of merging these co-ops into a large-scale agricultural bank is a good suggestion. Only then can the interests of Taiwan's farmers and fishermen be guaranteed under a healthy financial institution.
Agricultural affairs should be separated from financial affairs. Financial experts should be brought in to watch over the purses of farmers and fishermen. Revenues generated therein should be used for expanding distribution networks for agricultural produce and for other agricultural measures.
Everyone knows that the farmers' and fishermen's associations have arrived at a stage where reforms are inevitable. But the pan-blue camp has tried to use the two groups as tools for political wrangling. They have fomented their anger in an attempt to block the government's reform efforts.
This is a repeat of the uproar over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant. The opposition camp has won face, but the entire citizenry will have to pay dearly for it.
The postponement of reforms will only aggravate the financial hemorrhage at the co-ops. If a bank run breaks out, the government will have to clean up the mess and take care of all the bad loans and bad assets. Meanwhile, those who have so abused and pillaged the co-ops will get away scot free.
The government cannot afford to forget its mission of bringing Taiwan into a new era. It should show some guts and demonstrate that it is not afraid of losing political power. It should stop acting like the KMT government, making people wonder where Taiwan's future lies.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS