The serious difficulties facing Taiwan's economy means that various individuals and organizations will voice dissatisfaction with government policies. This is inevitable in a democratic country.
Reports about a demonstration in Taipei by about 100,000 farmers and fishermen this Saturday should not worry society. Nor should the planned protests cause the government to weaken appropriate reforms of the credit departments of farmers' and fishermen's associations. Policy flip-flops will only confuse matters and cause people to lose faith in the government's reform measures.
To be fair, executives at the farmers' and fishermen's credit co-operatives are responsible for most of the financial difficulties facing the co-ops. These executives, in cooperation with opposition politicians, have fanned the flames of anger for the farmers and fishermen, whose livelihoods have long been facing difficulties. They have painted the government's plan to manage the failing co-ops as an attempt to "annihilate" them.
They have forced the government to make a major policy U-turn by suspending implementation of the reforms. This will allow the co-op executives, who have long preyed on ordinary rural citizens, to carry on with their financial misdeeds. The consequences of this will be endless and farmers and fishermen will find it even more difficult to improve their livelihoods.
The farmers' and fishermen's associations have long been controlled by the KMT and have long since evolved into political platforms for local gangsters. In every election, the KMT has engaged in vote-buying through these organizations.
In addition, local factions have often treated the credit co-ops like their own personal coffers. Illegal and non-performing loans have been serious and prevalent problems at the co-ops. Many of them are facing collapse due to widespread embezzlement.
In short, the credit co-ops are a time bomb waiting to blow up Taiwan's financial sector. There can be absolutely no excuse for the government to avoid reforming these corrupt institutions.
Former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) idea of merging these co-ops into a large-scale agricultural bank is a good suggestion. Only then can the interests of Taiwan's farmers and fishermen be guaranteed under a healthy financial institution.
Agricultural affairs should be separated from financial affairs. Financial experts should be brought in to watch over the purses of farmers and fishermen. Revenues generated therein should be used for expanding distribution networks for agricultural produce and for other agricultural measures.
Everyone knows that the farmers' and fishermen's associations have arrived at a stage where reforms are inevitable. But the pan-blue camp has tried to use the two groups as tools for political wrangling. They have fomented their anger in an attempt to block the government's reform efforts.
This is a repeat of the uproar over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant. The opposition camp has won face, but the entire citizenry will have to pay dearly for it.
The postponement of reforms will only aggravate the financial hemorrhage at the co-ops. If a bank run breaks out, the government will have to clean up the mess and take care of all the bad loans and bad assets. Meanwhile, those who have so abused and pillaged the co-ops will get away scot free.
The government cannot afford to forget its mission of bringing Taiwan into a new era. It should show some guts and demonstrate that it is not afraid of losing political power. It should stop acting like the KMT government, making people wonder where Taiwan's future lies.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS