US President George W. Bush was the big winner in the US mid-term elections, gaining the legitimacy and mandate that he had never really had following the controversial result of the 2000 presidential election. Commen-tators are almost unanimous that it was Bush's push, engineered by his White House advisor Karl Rove, that was a key factor in the Republicans' stunning victory.
Bush played the war card and played it well. The tactic won and has gained Bush national support for his focus on Iraq. This, along with conflict with North Korea and the anti-terror campaign, will now dominate all other foreign policy issues.
Taiwan issues might be judged more directly now on how they impact US-China relations because the administration realizes that it must have China's acquiescence if the issues of Iraq, North Korea and anti-terrorism are to be dealt with effectively. For example, while Bush stood firm on US policy toward Taiwan and expressed concern about Chinese policies on human rights, religious persecution, Tibet and minorities at last month's summit between himself and Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
During the joint Bush-Jiang press conference at Crawford, Bush said, "The United States seeks and is building a relationship with China that is candid, constructive and cooperative. We will continue building this relationship through contacts at many levels in months to come, including a new dialogue on security issues."
Immediate signs of this shift in relations are the planned trip of US Vice President Dick Cheney to China, the announcement on Nov. 7 that a US Navy ship will visit a Chinese port this month, the US' hosting of a group of Chinese generals next month, the visit by the admiral who commands US forces in the Pacific to China in December and the resumption of senior-level defense talks not held since December 2000.
What does all this mean for Taiwan policy? The Bush administration will retain its robust commitment to Taiwan's security but, because China's cooperation is now so vital to the Bush administration, Taiwan issues will be played more quietly.
Therefore, Congress needs to step up its already very strong support for Taiwan. While 11 members of the 118 member-strong Congressional Taiwan Caucus will not return next session, the four caucus co-chairs are anxious to continue their efforts and newly elected members will surely join. Good friends of Taiwan like representatives Ben Gilman, Bob Stump and Robert Schaffer will be missed, as will senators Jesse Helms, Frank Murkowski and Robert Torricelli. However, caucus member Saxby Chambliss has moved from the House to the Senate and strong Taiwan supporter Representative Nancy Pelosi is ready to take over as House minority leader.
According to sources, four key congressional positions will be held by members who know Taiwan policy quite well: Senator Richard Lugar will chair the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Chuck Hagel the Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Representative Henry Hyde on the House International Relations Committee and Representative Jim Leach on the Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific.
Lugar knows US policy toward China and Taiwan inside and out. A speech Lugar gave in January last year shows he understands the nuances and comes down strongly on the side of a "constructive policy towards China." Lugar understands the dynamic changes that have taken place in Taiwan and believes that "it would be unthinkable for any US administration to stay aloof during a Chinese attempt to take Taiwan by military means. US credibility would suffer throughout the region and beyond."
His hope two years ago, and one presumes today, is for the US to "support Taiwan's economic and democratic way of life and explore opportunities to develop more friendly and cooperative ties with China."
Leach holds similar views. While Representative Henry Hyde is inclined to take a more skeptical view of a "constructive" relationship with China, he is the ultimate team player and will work with the administration. Hagel fits this pattern as well.
These four Congressional leaders will care about what the Chinese "red lines" are and how to make sure China does not become an obstacle to US interests.
While the State Department's view of relations with China would seem to have been strengthened by the election and the Republican takeover of the Senate, the administration's robust commitment to Taiwan's security will continue with military training and growing "interoperability" between Taiwanese and US forces.
In short, US policy toward Taiwan remains complex. The status quo, whether in cross-strait ties or US-Taiwan relations, is a dynamic, ever-shifting reality.
The Formosan Association for Public Affairs will continue to formulate strategy with our friends in Congress on how best to proceed to protect Taiwan's dignity, sovereignty and security at this crucial historical moment.
As the saying goes: "Change creates opportunities and opportunities create new worlds and new horizons." This change in the US Congress surely creates opportunities for Taiwan. It is then up to all of us to create new worlds and new horizons.
Wu Ming-chi is president of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS