The Presidential Office is the nexus of power in the nation. Naturally the conduct of the president, vice president and secretary-general within should adhere to the highest standards. However, it seems that the three bigwigs in the Presidential Office haven't adhered to even the lowest standards.
Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is already president. As such, he can not, need not and should not comport himself the way other people do. If the head of state is always squabbling, fighting and getting in shouting matches with others, it is detrimental to the dignity of the office and extre-mely inappropriate.
Chen frequently forgets himself, however. He can fulminate when Taipei City Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) doesn't go see him. Again and again, he can suggestively hint at precisely how many times PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) met with him -- to the extent of demanding that the spokesman for the Presidential Office hold a formal news conference on the subject. Even the commander of the military police can join the fray by putting in his two cents. One might get the impression they were dealing with a matter of the utmost importance.
It's bad enough that the president treats these trifles as affairs of state, but what's worse is that he takes the lead in waging meaningless shouting matches. Today he blasts one person; tomorrow it's someone else. He rages to his heart's content, but this behavior diminishes the status of the president. It also narrows the role he can play and utterly degrades his office.
The vice president is an alternate head of state. She has no personal freedom of speech worth mentioning on state matters. As soon as she opens her mouth, she speaks for the president, the administration and even the nation. Other people interpret her statements this way, and she should demand the same of herself.
But Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) can't even get this bit of basic common sense right. Scholars can speak freely about the Chinese Communist Party's 16th National Congress, criticizing Beijing however they wish, but Lu is the vice president. If she holds a press conference in the Presidential Office to state an opinion, then every sentence she utters represents the administration, the nation and of course to an even greater extent, the president.
If the vice president doesn't represent the president when she makes a statement about a matter as important as the CCP's 16th National Congress at a formal press conference in her own office, then haven't affairs of state become a children's game?
It's ridiculous enough that Chen agreed to let Lu convene a personal press conference on the grounds of "freedom of speech." But it's completely absurd that Lu would make a point of emphasizing that her words did not represent the president's opinion.
As for Secretary-General of the Presidential Office Chen Shih-meng's (
No one who willingly takes an official post can both be part of an administration and speak as an opposition outsider. It's impossible to be a high official and at the same time be above it all.
Moreover, if Chen Shih-meng really advocates establishing an independent nation, he shouldn't serve as an official of the ROC, drawing an ROC salary and enjoying the privileges of a specially appointed ROC official.
By what logic can he depend upon the ROC for his livelihood and his authority while disdaining the ROC and even harboring other loyalties? If he really had any principles, he should have disdained accepting the post of secretary-general.
Taiwan's political figures are so disappointing because they frequently act in arbitrary and unrestrained ways. Now the three bigwigs of the presidential office are acting this way too.
I don't see what we can expect from politics of this sort.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS