President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) held a meeting with senior economic officials yesterday to discuss joblessness and related issues. At the end of the day the meeting seemed to be yet another exercise in futility -- the same old problems, the same old calls for action. It's hard to see the difference between yesterday's session and those at Ta Shee and Sanchih. Three meetings in three months and there is still no sign that anything effective is being done or even planned.
Chen issued a 10-point statement calling for the unemployment rate to be lowered to 4.5 percent within a year (it was 5.32 percent as of September). He also spoke of targeting an annual NT$1.2 trillion in major investments over the next five year and expanding efforts to attract foreign investment. But then he ordered a halt to the proposed reform of the farmers' and fishermen's cooperatives -- something that just about everyone but venial politicians agree is a priority.
That just about sums up Taiwan's attitude toward reform. Lots of talk about problems and the need for change, lots of advice from academics, formulate a plan, publicize it and then back down when politicians turn up the heat.
Despite repeated assurances from the Ministry of Finance that the government is determined to carry out much needed reforms it appears that no one in a position of authority has either the power or the backbone to press ahead. The finance ministry and the rest of the Executive Yuan are livid with frustration. After such a public U-turns on reforms, what official would ever dare implement policies again?
The biggest economic problems facing the nation are lackluster investor interest, massive capital outflow to China, declining vitality and rising unemployment. The government has repeatedly flipflopped on tackling these problems. It wants more investment, but then it talks about opening direct links with China. It wants to expand investments in infrastructure and implement the "Taiwan priority" investment policy -- but it has yet to come up with a concrete way of blocking capital outflow.
Unemployment has been over 5 percent for more than a year. One would think the government would try to allocate money to provide professional training to the unemployed to help establish them in new careers or provide subsidies to businesses that hire the unemployed. The government can't seem to find the money to fund such programs -- though it spent NT$16.8 billion on stipends for elderly people in order to make good on one of Chen's election promises.
The political motivation behind Chen holding his latest brainstorming session -- just two weeks away from election day -- is just too obvious. This puts the proposals for salvaging the economy under a thick political cloud. They will become a focus of controversy in the remaining days of the campaign, which is a shame. Hopefully the ruling and opposition parties will stop paying lip service to the economy and instead show some sincerity, set aside their political prejudices and cooperate to pull Taiwan out of this economic quagmire.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS