Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
That was, of course, Ma's attempt on the eve of the second debate to show that he really cared about Taiwan after all. It's interesting that he felt he had to do this. After all, his disproportionately mainlander Taipei constituency doesn't care about Taiwan -- except as a foxhole -- and never has. Could Ma's new-found concern for Taiwan's dignity -- which he has done as much as anyone to trash in the last two years since the KMT fell in love with the goal of Greater China regional hegemony under PRC leadership -- reveal something of his wider ambitions? Being Beijing's stooge might be safe in Taipei but plays very poorly indeed in southern Taiwan, which Ma will need if he wants to oust President Chen Shui-bian (
And so we come to the debate yesterday which was very much of an anticlimax. After the murder of Taipei City Councilor Chen Chin-chi (
One of the best parts of DPP candidate Lee Ying-yuan's (
In all fairness though, what the Chen murder really makes one think about is not a lack of safety on the capital's streets, but the murky world of the City Council and many of those who sit on it -- with their close relationship to organized crime.
Beyond this the debate was rather dull, going on at length about trash bags and commute time to CKS airport. Probably the most interesting question was on renaming Taipei's streets, with their nauseating litany of China-derived names, redolent as they are of KMT colonialism. This was something that should have tripped up Ma, but Lee gave him an easy ride -- as he generally did, in fact, all through the debates.
Another issue which could have been fruitfully pursued was why Ma supports the fetishism of mainland culture by his Bureau of Cultural Affairs, or what his problem might be with flying the flag. But the lasting impression of the debates has to be puzzlement about why it is that the DPP can swing away but never seems to be able to land a punch, even on an opponent as vulnerable as Ma. When will they learn?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS