The annual Golden Horse Film Festival awards ceremony was held in Kaohsiung yesterday. Because the organizers had invited several Chinese actors and wanted to avoid political conflict, they did not invite President Chen Shui-bian (
Things are, however, not that simple. Chinese films are registered to participate in the festival, and last year's best actor and actress, who had agreed to participate, are also Chinese. Once the debate over whether to invite Chen surfaced, they immediately withdrew their participation. This was obviously due to China-related political factors. The organizers clearly do not consider national sovereignty, and are guilty of nothing short of belittling Taiwan. It is sad to see the Golden Horse Film Festival come to this.
Arthur Iap (
We agree. By accommodating China, the organizers are letting it use Taiwanese government funds to wage a war of cultural unification on Taiwan.
The Golden Horse Awards ceremony is a grand occasion in film circles. But the meaning of the annual awards has become distorted, turning both government and organizers into losers. In future, perhaps film circles should reconsider the value of the festival's continued existence. The government should also review whether there are other ways to boost the local movie industry, apart from funding the festival.
Why does Taiwan's film industry indulge China this way? The only explanation is that they harbor unrealistic dreams about the China market. That audience of 1.2 billion people has featured in their fantasies as they have searched for a source of new vitality since Taiwan's own film market went into recession.
Taiwan long ago opened its doors to allow imports of Chinese movies, but only last year, after striving for 12 years to break into the China market, was one Taiwanese movie imported by China -- after passing through mandatory censorship for ideologically sensitive material. The door to the China market remains firmly closed.
Even if the exchanges are one-sided, however, Taiwan's film circles are willing to accept setbacks with resignation and try to accommodate China to win favor. They compete for opportunities to cooperate with China in producing films or strive for the rights to distribute Chinese films. How ludicrous!
The salaries of the Golden Horse film festival organizers come largely from Taiwanese taxpayer's pockets. But for fear of offending China, they repeatedly debase themselves and even threaten to call off the show.
One is left feeling that they are ignorant and crass. If we let this group continue to steer Taiwan's film world, it's very hard to feel optimistic that better days will follow. The time has come for a thorough overhaul.
If the people in Taiwan's film circles pledge their allegiance to China's communist regime, we advise the government not only to stop subsidizing the Golden Horse Film Festival, but also to get rid of the awards all together. Beginning next year, let the organizers go participate in Chinese film festivals -- that is, if Beijing will let them.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS